Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State (CT) Backs Sub Base Projects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 06:52 AM
Original message
State (CT) Backs Sub Base Projects
State Backs Sub Base Projects
August 06, 2010
The Day, New London, Conn.

Groton -- The state of Connecticut is allocating another $3 million for projects at the Naval Submarine Base to help ensure the base's future.

Connecticut became the first state to fully fund a construction project on a base last year when Gov. M. Jodi Rell gave Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus $7.65 million to make improvements at the submarine base.

Now Rell plans to give the Navy another $3.22 million for projects that will improve the training for the officers and sailors at the Naval Submarine School. Rell said Tuesday that she expects the state Bond Commission to approve the funding on Aug. 11.

Mabus returned to the base on Saturday for the commissioning of the USS Missouri (SSN 780).

"I do think it's a wonderful program that Connecticut has," Mabus said, when asked about the state's investment in the base. "It shows the faith Connecticut has in its work force. It shows the faith Connecticut has in the military, and it shows the faith that Connecticut has in the Navy in particular. I would urge other states to take a close look at it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad that my state supports the sub base, but...
the fact that state funds are being used to improve a federal military facility, when billions of dollars are being spent annually in Iraq & Afghanistan just seems wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am torn.
I understand the reasons for NOT supporting something like this.

But on the other hand, the Sub Base is about 5 minutes from my house.

If it closed this area would be economically devastated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely true. The sub base is necessary for...
that area's economy. I'm in Waterbury, so it doesn't effect me as much, but the ripple effect would certainly be felt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And this is the reason the MIC is in the driver's seat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. +100
About the only decent jobs left are those DOD related or sub-related to the DOD. That is the HUGE elephant in the room. Who wants to go after those jobs. I had to listen to a guy last week who happen to be an engineer for Lockheed and he also helps them write Gov. proposals. All he went on about was Obama being a socialist without any thought of the hipocracy of his statement. If anyone's pay was coming from the taxpayer it is this guy. By the way, this 30 year old did have a nice 42' Cabin Cruiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC