Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sens. Schumer and Feinstein seek legislation to exclude Wikileaks from Federal Shield Law protection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:32 AM
Original message
Sens. Schumer and Feinstein seek legislation to exclude Wikileaks from Federal Shield Law protection
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 11:35 AM by bigtree
from truthout: http://www.truth-out.org/bacevich-vietnam-vs-munich-and-creating-iraqafghanistan-syndrome62036


August 05, 2010 11:56 am ET by Joe Strupp

In light of the recent uproar over WikiLeaks releasing controversial documents related to the Afghanistan War, congressional supporters of the Federal Shield Bill are updating the legislation to exclude Web sites that leak secret documents, according to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The committee revealed on its website: (http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11511)

In a reaction to foreign website Wikileaks' publication of 75,000 Afghanistan war documents, Democratic Sens. Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein are now drafting an amendment to exclude such websites from the pending legislation. However, it is not clear that a U.S. federal subpoena could even be served on the website, which bases its operations in Iceland, Sweden and other locations.

"Under the bill, if the federal government could somehow claim jurisdiction over WikiLeaks and issue a subpoena to find out more information about a source, WikiLeaks would not be able to quash the subpoena as there are broad national security exceptions to the protection," said Paul Boyle, Senior Vice President of the Newspaper Association of America.

The bill, known as the Free Flow of Information Act, would allow a reporter to have a court quash a federal subpoena for source information or materials, with some exceptions. A few senators from both political parties, including Feinstein, had repeatedly expressed reservations about the legislation and how its provisions applied to leakers of classified information.

"Senate sponsors want to shore this up by stating it is not their intention to cover WikiLeaks-type websites that simply publish raw data without editorial oversight," Boyle said.


read: http://www.truth-out.org/bacevich-vietnam-vs-munich-and-creating-iraqafghanistan-syndrome62036
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. More democrats for an informed public I see. -nt
Great news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. They can both go to H....ll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dianne Einstein afraid of cutting into the profits,
I think I remember her husband or someone making money off these choice wars. Either way Fuck these cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. The "Free Flow of Information Act" is designed to stop the free flow of information.

They try to come up with clever names to hide the real intentions of their legislation.

Kind of like the "Affordable Health Care for America Act" which should have been called the "Health Insurance Industry and Big Pharma Protection Act".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Clear Skies Act", etc, etc... -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. free flow of information act . . .
that is funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Bush would be impressed with the names the Democrats come up with for legislation.
It makes his "Clear Skies" look almost amateurish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC