Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DEVASTING (To Secular Arguments) Prop. 8 Ruling Matters Less than Judge's Findings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:57 AM
Original message
DEVASTING (To Secular Arguments) Prop. 8 Ruling Matters Less than Judge's Findings
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 09:20 AM by kpete
August 4, 2010 5:57 PM
Prop. 8 Ruling Matters Less than Judge's Findings

......................

Walker seems to go out of his way to try and demolish the secular arguments against same-sex marriage:

1. Marriage is and has been a civil matter, subject to religious intervention only when requested by the intervenors.

2. California, like every other state, doesn't require that couples wanting to marry be able to procreate.

3. Marriage as an institution has changed over time; women were given equal status; interracial marriage was formally legalized; no fault divorce made it easier to dissolve marriages.

4. California has eliminated marital obligations based on gender.

5. Same-sex love and intimacy "are well-documented in human history."

6. Sexual orientation is a fundamental characteristic of a human being.

7. Prop 8 proponents' "assertion that sexual orientation cannot be defined is contrary to the weight of the evidence."

8. There is no evidence that sexual orientation is chosen, nor than it can be changed.

9. California has no interest in reducing the number of gays and lesbians in its population.

10. "Same-sex couples are identical to opposite-sex couples in the characteristics relevant to the ability to form successful marital union."

11. "Marrying a person of the opposite sex is an unrealistic option for gay and lesbian individuals."

12. "Domestic partnerships lack the social meaning associated with marriage, and marriage is widely regarded as the definitive expression of love and commitment in the United States.

The availability of domestic partnership does not provide gays and lesbians with a status equivalent to marriage because the cultural meaning of marriage and its associated benefits are intentionally withheld from same-sex couples in domestic partnerships."

13. "Permitting same-sex couples to marry will not affect the number of opposite-sex couples who marry, divorce, cohabit, have children outside of marriage or otherwise affect the stability of opposite-sex marriages."

more:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20012701-503544.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Devastating to the appeal
For Fat Tony can twist the law all he wants, but the findings of fact will not be on appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R Totally destroying their arguments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R Brilliant!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great ruling. Top notch. But it's not devasting for the secular
point of view. It's devastating for the religious point of view. What the Judge said is that marriage is a secular, nonreligions thing.
Therefore, all the foo far rah about how religion says this or that or jeezus gets to say who gets married doesn't apply.
Marriage is a civil, secular thing, not religious.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC