Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scooter Libby - speed bump?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:41 AM
Original message
Scooter Libby - speed bump?
The more I read/hear about the Libby trial the more I become convinced that Libby is not a scapegoat or sacrificial lamb -- he's a speed bump

the trial is not about who leaked what when - it's about Libby lying to the grand jury. The longer the trial goes on, the longer it's going to take to find out who leaked what and when - thus it's become a speed bump and slows things down.

Is Fitzgerald still investigating the original "leak"?

the testimony so far is showing that libby lied. Whether or not the jury will buy the "I misremembered" defense is yet to be seen.

What is being hinted at by MSM reports is the extent of Cheney's involvement.

In almost all of the testimony heard so far - once you get past the Libby "misremembering" - it leads to Cheney.

On Hardball last night, Tweety was dancing around the Cheney connections, and how throughout the run-up and onset of the Iraq invasion - Cheney/Bush Inc. have blamed everyone else for "faulty intelligence" and other "mistakes".

(I checked the hardball website - no transcript is up as of this morning)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. My understanding is that new evidence is being awaited
in other words, if the trial brings about new evidence - or Scooter flips - an existing grand jury will be used to hear evidence and continue the investigation, just as before.

I think your speed bump analogy is very appropriate. The reason Libby's in the dock is because he's preventing solid proof for more serious charges from being obtained; weak proof with so much smoke kicked up is just not enough for a federal prosecutor to be going after the Vice-President of the United States. Libby's obstruction is provable, so that's what's being taken to court. It also conveniently pits Libby against the administration and encourages lots of backstabbing. We've seen some of that already. How far it will go, I have no idea, and perhaps Fitz doesn't either, but it seems a mix of rolling the dice and guaranteeing (to the extent he can possibly predict anything that relies heavily on his own competence) that Libby's head, at least, goes on a pike.

He's done mob cases so, he knows the best approach. We'll see if his best is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC