Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As Obama Talks Peace, Many Iraqis Are Unsure aka Same As It Ever Was

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:27 AM
Original message
As Obama Talks Peace, Many Iraqis Are Unsure aka Same As It Ever Was
As Obama Talks Peace, Many Iraqis Are Unsure
By ANTHONY SHADID
______
Saud al-Saadi, an eloquent and informed teacher in Sadr City, was aware. But, he said, he had heard such pronouncements before, declarations of turning points in America’s experience here that seemed to hew to the logic of American politics. The American occupation was declared over before the 2004 presidential election. The two countries signed strategic agreements weeks before the Bush administration ended.

“But until now, to tell you the truth, we haven’t grasped our sovereignty,” Mr. Saadi said. “There are still American troops here, they still raid houses, we don’t have a government that makes its own decisions and the American ambassador still interferes.”

Mr. Saadi was neither angry nor disillusioned. And in his matter-of-fact appraisal, there was a hint of common ground between a teacher and a president. Mr. Obama did not trumpet democracy or victory. There was no reference to a mission accomplished. In a sober appraisal, he acknowledged that there would be more American sacrifice here.

Mr. Saadi was no less modest.

Interests, he called it. And the United States, he said, would try to secure its own.
“America is not a charity organization,” he said. “It’s not a humanitarian group.
There are words and there is reality, and actions don’t always match those words.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/world/middleeast/04iraq.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. In the end nothing has really changed
It's a process, not an event. August isn't all that different from July, and won't be all that different from September. That's not so much a criticism as a statement of reality. 50K troops that are doing the same thing they were last month is an accomplishment that could have been claimed months ago, except for the number. What the troops "won't be doing" in September is what they "haven't been doing" since about mid 2008. Of course, because they haven't been doing it, we have been able to actually pull the troops and equipment out (much of which has been sent to Afghanistan). Strangely, the question is why do we need to take 18 months to get the last 50K out? The answer is because they are still doing alot of things, and they sound alot like combat, and will continue for many more months.

The fuller quote from the article:

To an American audience, it might resonate that way. Less so to Iraqis. Unlike last year, Iraqi officials, mired in disputes often more personal than political, are not trumpeting the withdrawal as an assertion of an Iraqi authority. Neither Mr. Sweid nor Mr. Abdel-Jabbar knew about the August deadline. The same went for several others interviewed Tuesday.

“I don’t know exactly when the withdrawal is supposed to happen,” said Abdel-Hamid Majid, a 52-year-old engineer. “All I know is it’s not far away.”

Saud al-Saadi, an eloquent and informed teacher in Sadr City, was aware. But, he said, he had heard such pronouncements before, declarations of turning points in America’s experience here that seemed to hew to the logic of American politics. The American occupation was declared over before the 2004 presidential election. The two countries signed strategic agreements weeks before the Bush administration ended.

“But until now, to tell you the truth, we haven’t grasped our sovereignty,” Mr. Saadi said. “There are still American troops here, they still raid houses, we don’t have a government that makes its own decisions and the American ambassador still interferes.”

Mr. Saadi was neither angry nor disillusioned. And in his matter-of-fact appraisal, there was a hint of common ground between a teacher and a president. Mr. Obama did not trumpet democracy or victory. There was no reference to a mission accomplished. In a sober appraisal, he acknowledged that there would be more American sacrifice here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC