Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times - Krugman - "Tax Cut Truthiness" - Destroys Bush Tax Cut Talking Points!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 02:23 AM
Original message
NY Times - Krugman - "Tax Cut Truthiness" - Destroys Bush Tax Cut Talking Points!
Edited on Mon Aug-02-10 02:24 AM by TomCADem
So much of journalism today resembles the hashing and re-hashing of the latest Frank Lutz talking points that it is refreshing to get some straight up analysis and fact:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/tax-cut-truthiness/


For my sins, I followed a link from Matthew Yglesias to Erick Erickson’s explanation of how great the Bush tax cuts really were. And there I learned some things I didn’t know:

* * *

Likewise, after the 2003 tax cuts, the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level since World War II. Let me repeat that: the Bush economic program created the lowest unemployment level ever.

More um:

<?&chart_type=line&graph_id=&category_id=&recession_bars=On&width=480&height=288&bgcolor=%23B3CDE7&graph_bgcolor=%23FFFFFF&txtcolor=%23000000&ts=8&preserve_ratio=true&fo=ve&id=UNRATE&transformation=lin&scale=Left&range=Custom&cosd=1960-01-01&coed=2010-06-01&line_color=%230000FF&link_values=&mark_type=NONE&mw=4&line_style=Solid&lw=1&vintage_date=2010-07-28&revision_date=2010-07-28&mma=0&nd=&ost=&oet=&fml=a>

The bit about unemployment really surprised me — after all, the incredibly good job market of the late 90s isn’t that far behind us.

But I think we have part of the key to how Republicans can believe that returning to the Bush agenda is exactly what we need: they’ve invented themselves an alternate history in which wonderful things happened under Bush, and earlier booms have been sent down the memory hole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Paul is correct on this. The 'recovery' in the Bush years was a recovery at the top, just as this is
Bush's 'recovery' was the first 'recovery' since WWII where the workers did not reap more benefits than the corporations. Generally, recoveries see about 65% of the growth go to workers and 35% to corporate profits. Bush's recovery reversed that, completely. Add to that a net total of only 3 million jobs created in his 8 years and it amounts to no recovery below the top 2%.

The same will be true of this one if jobs and wages don't start going up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC