Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Brief Refresher on the Taliban's Worst-Kept Secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 01:41 PM
Original message
A Brief Refresher on the Taliban's Worst-Kept Secret
Edited on Sat Jul-31-10 01:48 PM by G_j
http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/wikileaks-taliban-afghanistan




A Brief Refresher on the Taliban's Worst-Kept Secret

Wikileaks' papers are just the latest Afghan military shockers to surface. Remember Reagan and the Pakistani spooks?

— By James Ridgeway

Fri Jul. 30, 2010 5:31 PM PDT

The "most damning collection of data" in Wikileaks' massive trove of secret documents from Afghanistan are 180 files that show the Pakistani intelligence service helping Taliban insurgents in their fight against US forces. The documents are dark reading indeed: They describe Pakistani agents meeting directly with the Taliban, supporting commanders of the insurgency, and even training suicide bombers. But for anyone versed in the contemporary history of Afghanistan, they are hardly news.

<snip>

That context is especially useful now. I explored the Taliban's history in my 2005 book The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11, which asked, did US 'allies' help make the attacks possible?" Most of what follows is adapted from that book.

After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the Pakistani intelligence service became a key part of the CIA's strategy in the country, where a full-scale covert war was carried out under Ronald Reagan, with hundreds of millions in funding eventually provided by Congress.

As meticulously described by Steve Coll in his Pulitzer Prize-winning 2005 book Ghost Wars, the covert operation took place under the zealous leadership of then-CIA Director William J. Casey, to whom Afghanistan represented an opportunity to fight the Soviets right on their own border. It was an opportunity for Pakistan, as well: As Soviet journalist Artyom Borovik wrote in his 1990 book The Hidden War, Pakistan's leader General Mohammed Zia-ul-Haq "saw in the Afghan conflict a unique opportunity to obtain a sharp increase in US military and financial aid to Pakistan. The Pakistani generals regarded the entrance of Soviet troops into Afghanistan as 'Brezhnev's gift.'" Over the next seven years, Reagan would engineer more than $7 billion in aid to Pakistan.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. CIA AND ISI NURTURED MUJAHIDEEN AND TALIBAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. More:
Zia was more than willing to support Casey's strategy, which included both funding the Afghan mujahaddin and attracting an international force of Islamic militants to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. According to Ahmed Rashid's 2000 book Taliban, Pakistan issued standing orders to all its embassies to grant visas to anyone who wanted to come and fight with the mujahaddin. As a result, a growing force of Muslims from around the world gathered in camps in easternmost Afghanistan, just across the Pakistani border. These camps, Rashid notes, became "virtual universities for future Islamic radicalism."

One of those in attendance was a wealthy Saudi named Osama Bin Laden. "I settled in Pakistan in the Afghan border region," he said in a 1998 interview with Agence France-Presse. "There I received volunteers who came from the Saudi kingdom and from all over the Arab and Muslim countries. I set up my first camp where these volunteers were trained by Pakistani and American officers. The weapons were supplied by the Americans, the money by the Saudis." Later, he said, "I discovered that it was not enough to fight in Afghanistan, but that we had to fight on all fronts, communist or western oppression."




Good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. remember when pointing out the possible "blowback" factor
of 9/11 was a no no for the mainstream, actually the whole blowback issue is taboo still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is still taboo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Paks used some of that money to fund their Nuclear Program
Thanks to Bill Casey and Ronnie Raygun, they now have the Bomb.

Be careful what you wish for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. ah yes,
that little matter...

what a mess,
on a highway to hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton allowing these criminals to walk away was possibly the worst (in)action
a President has ever taken. It retained the precedent of ruling privilege that so many fought and died to end over the centuries before him. It was shameless and, his actions afterward indicate, deliberate.

He sold us out to get his entry into the Big Club, and boy does it pay well.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Clinton's role
was even larger, though many moderate-to-conservative democrats appear incapable of processing this. As US President, he opted to have alQueda and Hezbollah "operatives" into Bosnia. (Boston Globe, 2-12-03; New York Times,2-11-03)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. not that big a secret: long known that the ISI is seriously compromised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick for the DU war hawks -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. an excellent find G j!
thank you!

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. and thanks
for the kick :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. It;s good to see James Ridgeway is still around. I need to
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 02:56 PM by jonnyblitz
dig out my unread copy of Steve Colls "Ghost Wars" mentioned in this piece and read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC