|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 01:43 PM Original message |
"Democrat" caller to Hartmann back Clinton's impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I know lots of sincere democrats who hated Clinton, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. That shows that you can't put much stock in anecdotal evidence - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. if the adult population was 180 million at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. He Backed the impeachment of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm no fan of Clinton, but I did not support impeaching him over Monica-gate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. He should have resigned. He should NOT have been impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapere aude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. For lying about a hummer? I don't think that rises to the level of a need to resign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. With you right down the line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtotire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Vote For Censure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Clinton had very few friends on the Hill in his own party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. the man lied under oath. period. end of story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. He lied under oath? Which response(s)? To which question(s)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. take a read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porque no (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. There's the rub. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. He didn't. There was no sex involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I hate lies... .both right and left.... sexual relations was defined for the depositions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I was hoping you would post that from the impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I didn't realize that it was sometimes ok to lie under oath.... /shrug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapere aude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Lying under oath about a blow job! Man that is really the worst thing a president has done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. lets take it one step further... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porque no (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. People like you enabled that witch-hunt because of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. and its people like you that dont understand the rule of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. No words should follow "lying under oath." It doesn't matter what its "about." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
36. Answer my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-15-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. I did and here it is again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porque no (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. How positively hysterical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Bush will never have to testify under oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. personally I think bush and cheney will get off scott free... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. PS What's this "good german" shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. WW2 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. Gee...how pure and stringent you are with Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. no free pass from me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. Huh? Lieberman called in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtotire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. Bush Lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. Where does this egghead stand on impeaching Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. I strongly opposed clinton, but not his impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matsubara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. His impeachment was a net plus, anyway... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SarahB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-14-07 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
39. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-15-07 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
40. Did you listen to the full call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC