Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Canary In The Coal Mine... 'Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option' - HuffPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:22 PM
Original message
The Canary In The Coal Mine... 'Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option' - HuffPo
Dodd Nixes Elizabeth Warren Recess Appointment Option
Jason Linkins - HuffintonPost
First Posted: 07-27-10 04:28 PM | Updated: 07-27-10 04:58 PM

<snip>

As far as the Democratic base is concerned, the best choice to head up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is Elizabeth Warren. And the Obama administration agrees that Warren is well-qualified to head up the agency essentially inspired by her. But confirming E-Dubs, that's another story! That would take political will or large Congressional majorities or something. And so there's a lingering doubt whether Warren is "confirmable."



Robert Gibbs is among those who think Warren's confirmation is doable. However, Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) disagrees, telling TPM's Brian Beutler, "I don't know, that's the question, how does he know that?"

Ahh, but what about using one of those recess appointment thingies? As our own Sam Stein reported today, the White House is "hint strongly" that some recess appointments are in the offing for the upcoming August recess. Dodd tells Beutler that this would be a really bad idea:

"I think that would be a huge mistake," Dodd said, in response to a question from TPMDC. "Recess appointments. No, no, no."

"I think those are, you know, Republicans used to do it, I think that's a mistake," Dodd added. "Except in the most extreme circumstances where you need someone because of an emergency pending, but as a routine matter, I think it's a fundamental mistake."


Oh! Well, you never know, maybe some "extreme circumstances" or a "pending emergency," like a massive unemployment crisis or a huge financial collapse will crop up one of these days!

<snip>

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/27/dodd-nixes-elizabeth-warr_n_661115.html

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because she would actually DO THE JOB as opposed to just occupying the position
What a POS Chris Dodd turned out to be. I'm sure he can hardly wait to begin lobbying/consulting for the banks and insurance industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you haven't figured it out now
Dodd is the financial industries whore. Of course he is going to fight her nomination....screw Dodd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh... I Figured It Out Long Ago...
Just presenting more evidence for the jury.

:shrug:

Some seem to be... unpersuaded.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Dodd can safely give the Obama Administration cover for appointing another Wall Street servant.
It's an election year. The White House knows what their base wants, but they're going to give their Wall Street bosses what *they* want. Now we get to watch Team Obama do their usual little dance, setting up a paper-thin drama that lets them say, "we agree with you, but, oh! That dang Congress!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dodd's thinking of his future career in banking
He doesn't want a REAL watchdog in the office. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dodd isn't the canary.
He's the mine supervisor at the Upper Big Branch mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where's the Obama posse stand on this? Their absence says a lot. nm
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 09:11 PM by rhett o rick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I am a true Obama supporter
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 11:47 PM by MadMaddie
We are talking about Dodd's actions not Obama's.

When Obama makes a a decision we can then discuss the decision but at this point it is irrelevant to the conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Plus Dodd loses his chance to bargain for kickbacks if Congress is bypassed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Pssst! hey dood - dud - dodd --- this IS an emergency!
A recess appointment for Elizabeth Warren would be great.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC