Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boner's REINS Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:06 AM
Original message
Boner's REINS Act
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 10:14 AM by Beetwasher
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/boehner-gets-specific-on-plan-to-halt-federal-regulation.php?ref=fpa

Boehner Gets Specific On His Plans To Halt Federal Regulation

House Minority Leader John Boehner has finally gotten specific about his recent call for a moratorium on new federal regulations, and TPM's gotten a look at just what kinds of regulations -- other than the obvious ones implementing health care and Wall Street reforms -- that Boehner's plan would block.

Boehner last week endorsed the REINS Act, sponsored by Rep. Geoff Davis (R-KY), which states that "any rulemaking where the estimated cost to Americans would exceed $100 million," could not go into effect "without Congress voting on it first." That's short of the full moratorium for which Boehner initially called, but could nonetheless be a recipe for gridlock and ugly politics. That standard in the act would ensnare scores of new regulations every year, including both broadly popular, time-sensitive ones, and others over which remain substantial partisan disagreement.

The REINS (Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny) Act, -(Ok, I just threw up in my mouth)-* while it imposes burdensome congressional oversight of regulations costing more than $100 million, does contain exemptions for emergency situations, enforcement of criminal laws, national security regulations, monetary policy rules proposed by the Fed Board of Governors, and the implementation of international trade agreements. Congress would have to explicitly sign off on everything else before it could take effect.

--snip--

*My comment

Hey Boner! Let me help you file that:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Aren't they cute?
Not a peep out of Boehner and his minions about Bush's endless signing statements subverting legislation. But now? Hoo boy, does the Executive branch need some reinin' in! And it's not just because Obama's black, so stop saying that; Hillary Klintoon would be entitled to the same treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's Amazing Chutzpah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC