Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our sympathies to the very wealthy...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:07 AM
Original message
Our sympathies to the very wealthy...
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 01:21 AM by kentuck
Our sympathies go out to those who will have to pay higher taxes, or perhaps lose their business, but many working people have lost everything they have, also. They were forced to spend all their retirement. And they have no commercial property to sell. They will not have the opportunity to pay capital gains. They gambled and lost in the Bush/Republican economy.

Entrepreneurs are not the only ones that gamble with their investment. Many workers gamble with their lives, hoping they don't get sick and are unable to provide for their families. Just because their investment is different from that of the owner does not mean it is not just as valuable or moreso.

The wealthy are not the only people that invest in this economy. It's just that they invest money and the workers invest their lives. It's gets to be rather tedious listening about these brave entrepreneurs taking a gamble by starting a new business, etc, etc. We all take gambles. We all have investments in the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. The difference is, the very wealthy are much smarter and work much harder.
Why do you want to penalize smart, hard-working people?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They're just BETTER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. most are simply better at entering the world through a wealthy birth canal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Most of the rest are just better at committing large-scale crimes, and getting away
with it. The "self-made" route to wealth. Transparency is very harmful to these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Truth Is That the Very Wealthy
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 01:42 AM by Anakin Skywalker
are born into it! Propagandists and revisionists such as Rush Limpball and the whole cast of Faux News try to fool the working class by saying that if you keep working hard you too can "succeed". It's a bald-faced lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. very true
the very rich people I know were born into it. I'm not sure they have more going for themselves than other folks do; just plenty of money.

Same old story I guess. It never changes either and it likely never will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. oddly I know of someone that falls into this category
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 01:57 AM by CountAllVotes
it is someone I used to work with. She married a doctor and she herself graduated from Amherst.

They have one son that is now 21 years old. He had to wait a whole 2 weeks to get his IPad and he drives around in a new Prius. He was offered his first job recently and turned it down as even though he found it amusing, it wasn't exactly what he had in mind career wise (must be nice huh?). I'll tell you, the "haves" take care of one another and they will never cease to exist and have power and control obviously.

The parents own three homes; one on the east coast and two on the west coast. One is worth about $3 million, the other is worth about $2.5 million and the third one is worth about $2 million.

I never hear from this people as I don't fit in with their class of acquaintances.

I suppose their taxes will go up but they can easily afford it.

I have no sympathy for these "haves". They've had it all their entire lives and perhaps they might remember life before the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy came in with Bush.

This is but one example of people that fit into this category that will be affected by the reinstated tax code pre-Bush. These tax cuts should have been suspended/revoked the day after Pres. Obama took office IMO given the tragic state of the economy.

:nopity: :nopity: :nopity:

:kick: & recommend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You know a lot about these people considering you never hear from them.
You're not hearing it from their acquaintances, either. Where are you getting all your info then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I've known them for over 25 years
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 12:21 PM by CountAllVotes
they live not far from where I once lived and I still know a lot of people from there, including them.

I know they must be very rich. They had several houses for awhile and I guess they sold those finally.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's an income tax. It's based on them making money, not losing money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's all very sad. The idea some fat cat might have to remodel
the cabin of his private jet without using gold plumbing fixtures is heartbreaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. I've got no problem with the top rate going back up on income.
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 07:28 AM by pnwmom
But I think returning to an estate tax rate of 55% on estates over $1 million is too steep. In some cities, just having a median price house and an IRA will put you at that level. People with estates of a million dollars are wealthy -- but not "very wealthy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doeed Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kentuck, you seem happy some may lose their businesses?
Guess what goes when their business goes under. The jobs of the hard working people you claim to care about.

The guy that owns the company I work for, is Forbes 400 rich. He loses it, and I'm on the street. In 60 days, I would LITERALLY be on the street.

The company (our district) already has had massive cutbacks. We have went from 12 route drivers down to 5. We have went from 6 warehouse personel down to 2. I am 2 people away from unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Corporations are blood sucking leaches in this country
Good riddance to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Sounds as if the Bush tax cuts
which have been effect since 2002 didn't do your employer's company very much good if the situation is as dire as you say; with all those layoffs. So we might as well do way with them. :-)

:nopity: <<<<<<<<< for your Forbes 400 employer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doeed Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Right
To Hell with the 100,000+ people in the United States and Canada who would lose their jobs (me being one of them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. There is not a large company in America laying off because of taxcuts..
Maybe the demand for your product is not there? Most Fortune 500 companies have had record productivity and record profits. Still they laid people off. They did not invest their huge taxcuts in labor or machinery. Unless it was abroad, of course.

I also work for a Fartune 500 company also. They have made record profits but they have laid people off because of lack of demand for their products and have not given any raises for over two years now. Just a couple of months ago, they went and paid $95 million in cash for 9 other small companies that make a similar product. Now they almost have a monopoly. How do you explain that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. You said that "the GUY that owns the company" you work for is
Forbes 400 rich. If that is the case, it means that he personally is worth no less then $1.3 Billion and likely much more. And on top of that he's currently benefitting from the Bush tax cuts. Yet he's still laying people off. Sounds as if this guy is earning far more then he's worth. If he cared so much about you, your laid off collegues and his own damn company why hasn't he invested some of his own personal fortune into it?

The Forbes 400 or 400 Richest Americans (first published in 1982) is a list published by Forbes Magazine magazine of the wealthiest 400 Americans, ranked by net worth. The list is published annually in September. In 2007, the combined wealth of the 400 was $1.54 trillion, and all of the members of the list were billionaires. The minimum to make the list in 2007 was $1.3 billion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_400




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. El Toro Poopoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. No sympathy from me.
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. But the wealthy are the ones who create the JOBS!!
You know, all those jobs just sitting there waiting for applicants!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. But, the downtrodden rich spend lots of money that provides jobs for whiny poor.
Who aren't even grateful for the generosity of the rich who buy the yachts and golden bathtubs.

Ah, well, those poor people are too stupid and lazy to select rich parents, go to Harvard Business School, or buy yachts of their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sorry but your post is too damn nice and too damn polite.
Fuck those fucking rich bastards who have stole every gawd damn thing that isn't nailed down in this country and are now coming for OUR Social Security!

OURS-NOT THEIRS!!!!

FUCK THEM!!! FUCK THEM!!! :grr: :mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I am in agreement with you
I used to work for a specialty design firm that created silk trees and flower arrangements..and overheard how the rich speak of any lesser beings..

Frankly a lot of them or most of them have no heart or caring in them, that is unless you are rich and the paparazzi are bothering them or some other minor setback. They are selfish and heartless and greedy and those are the 'nice' ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC