Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Democrats cave in and extend Bush tax cuts on people

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:29 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will Democrats cave in and extend Bush tax cuts on people
making over 250,000?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. NOT if Nancy Pelosi has anything to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, just remember how she stood firm for the public option n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. She resurrected health care when it seemed to be dead.
Don't forget.

She could not do a public option without the votes!

If only her vote counted then we would have a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. She said no bill would leave the House without a public option
She caved in and we got stuck with the Insurance Company Profit Protection Act. A bill that Rahm has crowed about because it keeps the private, for profit parasites in charge of our access to care.

I don't have a lot of hope that Pelosi will stand firm on this either.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do you understand numbers of votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. To understand actually standing up and fighting for something?
If they didn't have the votes for actual reform the bill should have died.

I don't appreciate being sold out to the insurance companies and there was no excuse for that happening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Do you understand defending values, and being true to what you said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know and I wish I did. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can we agree that it would be DESPICABLE if they did, or do we
need to allow for another bout of pragmatism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Given everything else they have caved in on in the last 10 years
Would anybody be surprised? :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Myself I think they will too. The Republicans
are sure pushing back on it, every time I turn on the TV, radio or open a paper I see we have to extend the Bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I voted yes, but sure hope I'm wrong. Just seems that they are
caving on too many issues and I am losing hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Me too
just from past experience but hoping they will stand for something eventually. Batting 0 so far but with the election coming maybe they will vote against it, might give them some focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. The best predictor of the future is past history.
"Democrats" and "cave-in" are practically synonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. It wouldn't surprise me.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Probably. Dry powder stays dry.
Really dry. So dry.

Hope I'm wrong, I really really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. If they do I will NEVER cast a vote their way again.
I will just withdraw from the political scene and let other folks worry about it..Because my votes will have been proved meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I understand your anger, but...
are you willing to have RW extremists running the country. This is a Catch-22.

On the other side of it though, I suppose that my life on a day-to-day basis is no different today than it was when Bush or Clinton or Bush or Reagan were in office. Ups and downs, just surviving. Oh oh, I am starting to feel like you do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The choice now is only Repub or Repub-lite.
Washington was right in his warnings about the party system (as was Eisenhower in his about the military-industrial complex).

The progressive wing of the Democratic Party is as dis-owned and dis-empowered by its party to the same degree that the repressive wing of the Republican Party is embraced and empowered by its party.

Given that, as you admit, on a day-to-day basis there seems no Change from the previous administration why not just bite the bullet and join the Socialists (or even those further left)?

If enough people did, then the left might have some real power - then there might be a prospect of real change: Not Change you have to Believe in - but Change that you can see.

Workers of the World ...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. As long as the Socialist party or the Green party or whatever
have not got a chance in hell of getting anywhere, I cannot in good conscience, throw my vote at them. Don't get me wrong, I consider myself a socialist (I noticed your quote by Sinclair Lewis), and yes, we are disowned. But I cannot be part of the reason that Repubs take this country away from us. They are the party preaching pray in school (Christian pray at that), they are the party who are taking freedoms from us (unless we are Teabaggers, and then we get a pass). I know that the Dems are at least leaning in my direction more than the Repubs are. We all have such differing opinions of everything (read any link on DU just for the Dem differences), and not one of us will be completely happy with decisions made. I will go with the party that is more in line with me AND has the ability to get elected. Call me a sellout, but I have to measure every side of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. The same way they didn't extend unemployment benefits ....
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. If they do it will prove they should lose their jobs in Nov.
I would imagine even the most die-hard and zealous Obama supporter would have a problem with this one... I would hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Would not be surprised to see a one or two year extentsion of these cuts
while simultaneously making the middle class tax cuts either permanent or extended for a longer period of time than the tax cuts for the rich.

This will make the issue solely about the expiring tax cuts for the rich when it comes up again perhaps in 2012, as the middle class tax breaks will no longer be in play. This would give Democrats better control of the narrative than they have today with all rates reverting to 2000 levels without any action by the end of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. I believe thisn't a party issue, the rich stay rich and that's all that is written...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. No. Senate Democrats proposed it and if Tim Geithner is backing it,
it means they view it as a politically smart move (in addition to being the right thing to do).

They're not stupid and they know what it would mean to cave on this thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. No.
The tax cuts were and still are an enormously unpopular piece of shit (except to TeaDouchers who think they'll be rich someday) from the Bush administration that's blasting bigger holes in the debt every day. It's not even that big an increase; it isn't like the TMTR is going to 45-50% or anything. I really don't see what the big damned deal is either way. With their accountants, the wealthy likely aren't going to miss a drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC