The REAL Anti-Sherrod Agenda: Stopping The USDA Race Case

[kpete]

Conservatives Try To Bash USDA Anti-Racism Suit, Shirley Sherrod
Rachel Slajda | July 22, 2010, 8:51AM



In defending his decision to fire Shirley Sherrod, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack explained multiple times that his department has a "sordid" and "checkered" history of both overt and institutionalized racism. But with the term "racism" being tossed around rather a lot recently, it is important to understand both what he meant -- and what role that acknowledged racism played in Shirley Sherrod's life.

It's also important to understand that Andrew Breitbart's timing of the release of the grossly distorted video of Sherrod, which he admits having had for weeks, may not be entirely random. Congress will soon vote on whether to fund part of a settlement between the USDA and African-American farmers who faced acknowledged discrimination -- farmers like Sherrod and her husband used to be. It's a tiny piece of the upcoming war supplemental bill.

The USDA settlements with African-American farmers are a longtime bête noire of the right, which they deem a giveaway to a core Democratic constituency. It's not clear whether Brietbart's release of the video was specifically intended to hurt the chances of other African-America farmers to receive recompense from decades of discrimination that caused them to lose their farms, but conservatives immediately used the video to attack the settlement. The discrimination claims, known globally as the Pigford settlement, is the elephant in the room, so here's the background.

For years, and continuing through the 1990s, the USDA denied loans and grants to scores of farmers simply because they were African-American. Timothy Pigford finally sued the department in 1997; the suit became a class action with 400 additional plaintiffs and 2,000 farmers thought eligible; and the result was what's known as the Pigford settlement, decided in 1999.

more:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/shirley_sherrod_and_the_discrimination_of_black_fa.php

[Spazito]

1. I watched the Vilsack press conference and he referred, repeatedly, to...

the 'difficult' history of the USDA when it came to civil rights and the 10s of thousands of still outstanding claims needing to be settled. It seems as though this history was why Vilsack acted precipitously (and very badly by his own admission). It in no way excuses the actions he took but it does give some 'background' to the sensitivity.

I didn't know about this:

"Congress will soon vote on whether to fund part of a settlement between the USDA and African-American farmers who faced acknowledged discrimination -- farmers like Sherrod and her husband used to be. It's a tiny piece of the upcoming war supplemental bill."

It would NOT surprise me at all if this addition to the war supplemental bill is very much part of the right's agenda in trying to smear Ms. Sherrod and the USDA.

Edited to correct grammatical error.

[rbixby]

2. Classic distraction tactic

Accuse the other side of the very same crimes your side is frequently guilty of and keep pushing the lie.

[dgibby]

3. Interesting that Vilsack didn't offer to reinstate her into her old job.

Hmmmm????