Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wis. candidate can't use controversial description

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 07:57 AM
Original message
Wis. candidate can't use controversial description
Wis. candidate can't use controversial description

By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press Writer Scott Bauer, Associated Press Writer – Wed Jul 21, 9:30 pm ET

MADISON, Wis. – A legislative candidate from Wisconsin can't use a profane, racially charged phrase to describe herself on the ballot, an election oversight board decided Wednesday.

Ieshuh Griffin, an independent running for a downtown Milwaukee seat in the state Assembly, wants to use the phrase, "NOT the 'whiteman's b----.'"

But the state's Government Accountability Board voted to bar that wording, agreeing with a staff recommendation that it is pejorative and therefore not allowed.

State law allows independent candidates to have five words describing themselves placed after their names on the ballot as long as it's not pejorative, profane, discriminatory or includes an obscene word or phrase.

Griffin, who is black, argued her case to the five white, retired judges on the board that regulates elections. She said the phrase was protected free speech.

"It's a freedom of expression," she said. "It's not racial. It's not a slur."

MORE HERE: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100722/ap_on_fe_st/us_odd_ballot_expletive;_ylt=Aj_dSTA.mqHr8qy1PI5LXDrtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJvbHY4YjRrBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwNzIyL3VzX29kZF9iYWxsb3RfZXhwbGV0aXZlBGNwb3MDMQRwb3MDMgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawN3aXNjYW5kaWRhdGU-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. "It's a freedom of expression," she said. "It's not racial. It's not a slur."
"Not the whiteman's bitch" not racial and not a slur...teh stupid is strong even on the Democratic side of the aisle it would appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC