http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/21/AR2010072103534.html?sub=ARAP IMPACT: A political filter for info requests
By TED BRIDIS
The Associated Press
Wednesday, July 21, 2010; 7:36 PM
WASHINGTON -- For at least a year, the Homeland Security Department detoured hundreds of requests for federal records to senior political advisers for highly unusual scrutiny, probing for information about the requesters and delaying disclosures deemed too politically sensitive, according to nearly 1,000 pages of internal e-mails obtained by The Associated Press.
The department abandoned the practice after AP investigated. Inspectors from the department's Office of Inspector General quietly conducted interviews last week to determine whether political advisers acted improperly.
Please read the entire article at the link. This is not what I would have expected from The Obama Administration or Napolitano. They were clearly not following the letter, the spirit or the intent of the law. The fact that they stopped the practice after the AP looked into it is an acknowledgement of that.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/21/nation/la-na-ticket21-2010mar21A little secret about Obama's transparency
The current administration, challenged by the president to be the most open,
is now denying more Freedom of Information Act requests than Bush did.
March 21, 2010|By Andrew Malcolm
The Democratic administration of Barack Obama, who denounced his predecessor, George W. Bush, as the most secretive in history, is now denying more Freedom of Information Act requests than the Republican did.
Transparency and openness were so important to the new president that on his first full day in office, he dispatched a much-publicized memo saying: "All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA."