|
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 03:14 AM by sabrina 1
passion they go after their base, Breitbart et al would be a bit more careful about their hateful actions.
I have gone after Breitbart, O'Keefe, Giles and their racist backers as much as I can, online and off. I have NOT gone after this administraion, unless you consider disagreeing with some of their policies 'going after them'.
But those who were literally begging them NOT to give in on Van Jones, on ACORN because if they did, it would not stop, were ignored.
It hurts me to have to say that the Democrats are weak. They care more what buffoons like Breitbart have to say than the people who elected them which is evident in how each these clowns throw a faux temper tantrum, decent people are fired or defunded by Dems.
I wish we had strong leaders who would have stood by ACORN no matter how much kicking and screaming they heard from the right. And when Glen Beck et al lied outright lied about Van Jones, where was the response from Dems? The response was to fire him.
It is no wonder that this happened, and it will happen again, and again. If anyone thinks they will stop because this time ONE WOMAN stood up and demanded that the truth be told, they do not know these criminals.
Where's tough-guy Rahm when he's needed? He should be all over TV tonight exposing these liars, who is backing them, telling the public who they are and what they've done and who is funding them. Wasn't he supposed to be the 'attack dog'? The only people I've seen him attack are Obama's supporters. He doesn't seem very tough to me.
This is a perfect opportunity to announce a bill to restore the Fairness Doctrine, and to use this and the ACORN lies as examples of why it is so badly needed.
But that won't happen. The DLCers will advise that we can't do that, because it would anger the right and cause more problems.
There's an old saying 'you may as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb' which applies perfectly to this situation.
Whether Dems go after them or not, it will make no difference. They HATE democrats or people they perceive to be liberals, progressives and the poor and minorities and they need nothing other than their existence to continue to rouse them up. So, knowing that, Democrats may as well do something about them, because they won't stop until someone stops them.
|