Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I strongly believe in "sin taxes" What do you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:02 PM
Original message
I strongly believe in "sin taxes" What do you think?
You want to smoke, drink alcohol, do drugs, eat bad food, drink soda, have light firearms, go to prostitutes, get in tanning beds, it should all be OK with regulation and taxation equal to the economic costs to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. OH boy!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. pass the butter and diet coke please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're talking about a shakedown for money, and not even for victimless crimes here
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 02:05 PM by slackmaster
You're talking about private, personal choices that do no harm to anyone other than the person who indulges them, if at all.

Sin taxes are and have always been nothing but a way for government to extract money from people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Aren't all taxes..
"a way for government to extract money from people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Usually taxes have some kind of rational connection to the activity or goods being taxed
For example, fuel taxes are generally used to support transportation infrastructure.

Taxing stuff just to support the activities of the taxing authority doesn't make economic sense, unless your goal is to create a larger government that doesn't do any more actual work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
72. So electric cars don't ride on pavement only gasoline vehicles?
Gee they must be magical....


Off snark you can see the slippery slope your are on all taxes tax a certain group over another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. That doesn't follow logically from what I wrote
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. Fuel taxes are becoming less efficent every year to fund roads...
since more cars on the road do not use fuel.


It would be like a tax on television tubes to fund PBS...


Narrow taxes have a way of becoming obsolete... thats all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
73. "Shakedown". Interesting word, that. Seems to be in fashion. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. oh goody...another person who gets to 'decide' what 'sins'
are worthy of taxing...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. D&C is good at that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. if you want to make some serious money
start taxing fornicators, adulterers, kids that don't honor their mothers and fathers, people who don't keep holy the sabbath

there are hundreds if not thousands of other sins that we can tax

wonder if being a smart ass is among them

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. And let's tax marriage, and church, and the rich, and the rich again, and the beautiful...
Let's charge people a 'use tax' for wearing pants, and wearing skirts, and wearing dresses... and a steep tax on ties.

Let's charge a 5000 % 'sin tax' on tie sales!! And loafers. And pumps.

And a 12000% tax on floral dresses!!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
63. ties I agree with
simply due to the fact that I haven't worn one in two years or so

floral dresses-amen to that!

and pantyhose

I can't imagine how women wear those things

but no tax on loafers

I have a great pair that my mom bought me in Italy-handmade black leather!

beautiful shoes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5.  Who decides what a "sin" is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The legislatures that pass the taxes.
You're elected representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Many of us are not elected representatives.
I'm sure you mean 'your'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
71. Quite correct. I'm sorry. It won't happen again.
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 10:47 PM by verges
(Damn grammar police/nazi)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
66. That's the rub...
Who decides what's bad and what's super bad? Everything kills you...it's just a grab for extra taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. -1
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's better than throwing people in jail for doing them. Save jail and prison for real criminals.
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 02:06 PM by w4rma
Save police resources for investigating real criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. People should pay for that part of the government they use
People who make unhealthy choices should pay for what their choices cost the healthcare system, criminal justice system and society in general. For example, gun owners should pay hospitals for taking care of shooting victims, soda drinkers should pay for anti diabetic programs, smokers should pay for cancer research, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
69. Please list what you use, I think you just might pay off the deficit with the taxes we raise on you
alone.

By the way, who does get to keep the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also, buying inefficient cars, building sprawl
and other activities that have a negative impact on society. I'm fine with them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. What should the tax be for starting unnecessary wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll consider it
Right after we go over every facet of your private life so I can tax the shit out of anything I don't like with yet another regressive tax. Try taxing the rich before you go after the working class and poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well at least your name is apropos. n/t
:kick: & U

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, there's a good idea...
:sarcasm:

On the other hand, some sins would be good to tax, like avarice, greed, usury, and a few other like those. I notice that you didn't mention those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. If there's a social cost, yes. Otherwise, no.
Smoking should be taxed, to pay for damage caused by smoking.

Sabbath-breaking? No.

Obesity? No. Obesity isn't a "sinful" behavior, it's a pathology, and some of it is not related to such "sin".

Same for AIDS.

"Bad food"? Who's to say what's bad? I don't go along with Kathy Freston and Dr. Mercola's idea of what "bad food" is. PeTA wants to put a tax on meat. There's also the point that necessities of life ought not be taxed.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think we should start with reverting the income tax code to pre-1980 rates.
And go back to using a major portion of the federal revenue to provide block grants to states so that the states are not endlessly in trouble trying to fund their services and forced into raising property taxes and sales taxes and their own income taxes to do so.

Once we get the federal tax code back in line, no I don't have a huge problem with 'sin' taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sin is a religious concept that has no place in government.
One man's sin is another's delight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Sin has been in government ever since there was government!
Oh my, how naive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. "Oh my, how naive!" - - oh my, how rude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Folks used to think earth was flat, too. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Your morals shouldn't cost the rest of us one red cent. Maybe YOU be taxed
to offset the toll conventional morality has taken on humanity for more than 2,000 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't indulge in any of the above listed behaviors except: I own a lot of guns
and occasionally eat a pizza or an Italian sandwich.

Where can I apply for a refund?


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. That would fall under
an evility-tax. The eviler and scarier the gun, the higher your tax burden. The tax could be lighter though depending on how many are pink or some other non-scary color approved by the nannies.

:sarcasm: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I have several sawed off shotguns and an evil SKS, and about 14 various
handguns...actually so many I don't remember the exact number right now.
They are all pretty evil, though...I guess I'll have to cut back on the pizzas to make up the difference.

I better get an accountant...


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. OK as long as the sin involved is greed.....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. I see no problem with the government raising funds using taxes...
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 02:31 PM by Ozymanithrax
Consumption taxes, "sin taxes" tend to be regressive. Some of the items you mentioned would be difficult to define.

Cigarettes and alcohol are easy, and are taxed up the wazoo.

Drugs, unless you make their consumption legal, taxing them would be pointless.

Bad Food is a questionable item, a few things are obvious but many are not. Is too much salt taxed, or fat, calories?

As for a tax on handguns, the NRA would come at you with guns blazing. (I see no problem with it, but it would never pass in Congress, either nationally or in individual states. Attempting would be a waste of time.)

Prostitution is illegal in most states, so you can not levy a poll tax on prostitutes.

Tanning Beds: A tax that would fall heaviest on John Boehner would be great. I support that.

I prefer a tax where those who make more pay more rather than regressive consumption taxes that fall heaviest on a few individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hmmm...
"have light firearms"

Poll tax anyone?

I mean, the election of b*sh had some very definite economic costs to society, no?


The others...meh...give someone that ball and theyll run with it, and sooner or later it will be just like buying a pack of cigarettes in NY...ten dollars or better for a 3 dollar product.

Only it will be your soda (hands off my mountain dew, thanks) or your Icehouse (beer) or your wine or your taco bell or your kfc or your steak (when someone is allowed to decide its "bad" food)

Let me give you a counter example.



My body is MINE. And only MINE. And so therefore, by extension, are all decisions having to do with it.

Decisions to pierce, tatoo, abort a fetus, ingest, inhale, etc.


And if my body is NOT mine, what good...are the rights to vote, or the freedom of speech or any of the others?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. What is wrong with a sales tax on non-essential goods?
I think you are whining about the popular name for such taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. I prefer LUXURY taxes
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 02:37 PM by SoCalDem
There USED to be luxury taxes.. it was 10%

It was on stuff like jewelry, cosmetics, perfumes, furs etc.

It should be expanded these days to include liquor, snack foods/drinks & tobacco & anything with HCFS in it..

and I would like to see a 5% luxury tax on all fast food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Yes, luxury taxes. Or even greed taxes in keeping with the "sin" theme.
It's sad we don't have the luxury tax on the real luxuries like jewelry, etc. A lot of rich people couldn't have made their wealth in another country so why not help pay for America? This is a time in which America needs this tax money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Axle_techie Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. With the feds set to start monitoring
Americans BMI, whats to say they won't eventually implement a "fat tax"??? If they start taxing things at will, where will they stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. I don't believe in sin, so I don't believe in sin taxes anymore than unicorn taxes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. I strongly believe that self righteous flamebait is a sin...
pay up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. My thoughts on sin taxes.
Cigarettes: I gave them up years ago so tax them.
Alcohol should be taxed except for bourbon.
Why would you tax food that has gone bad? Maybe we should just tax those that cook food badly.
Drugs and prostitution should be taxed. With a possible once a quarter tax exemption for prostitution, in case I ever get the urge to employ one.
Handguns and shotguns should not be taxed only hunting rifles.
I've never used a tanning bed, so tax them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. A soda tax is in the news, in light of oil spill, maybe gas taxes should go up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Tax booze but not the wine I drink. I quit smoking so I am smugly in favor of
taxing cigarettes. I don't tan so tax the tanning parlors, please. I detest fast food so tax all of them. I'm retired and I dress down so please let's bring back the "sumptuary" laws of the Middle Ages...as long as males are taxed for their finery as well as women. What I REALLY don't wear are high heels and I think a tax on them would be dandy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. I strongly believe in "sinning".
And, yes... tax evasion is a "sin". :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. America is still jampacked with Puritans eager to get the "sinners".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
43. and who decides 'good' or 'bad' ....you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. So how do we tax your hubris?
For thinking these things are sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yes, start with ---> televisions and gaming consoles.
Install chips to transmit usage-per-hour to the designated nanny-beaurocracy that will have to be created just to keep up with the zillions of tax dollars collected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. If we tax people I deem stupid we would have no debt(nt)
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 03:40 PM by The Straight Story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FooshIt Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. Profit is a sin so lets just tax that ok?
and leave the poor alone thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
60. +1000
Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
51. I don't believe they should be called sin taxes
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 04:40 PM by LatteLibertine
and I have zero problems with taxes on most of the things you listed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
52. I strongly believe in taxing the living shit out of sin tax advocates
After all, these folks don't really spend money on anything other than feed for their high horses. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
53. Well that's stupider then usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
54. well, there's the rub: "Economic costs to society" (one of the rubs, anyways)
Let's just say I don't trust how some of those are calculated.

Then, of course, I also don't have a lot of trust that the people who get to determine what qualifies as a "sin" would stop where I would, so I'm inclined to err on the side of caution.

And somehow those "sin" taxes never cover avarice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. Ugh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biker13 Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
57. Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
58. As long as you get to define "sin", right????
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 06:13 PM by yella_dawg
On Edit:


Given your username, I have to wonder where you got this idea.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
59. Economic costs to society? Whoa boy, the taxes could be for so many things.
Define this. Are you air conditioning your home right how? Let's tack on a sin tax for the electricity you are using since the costs to the environment are enormous just to generate that power. Every thing you do has economic costs to someone in society. You are just listing things that are sins in your mind. I could say it is a sin to cut a tree down, so you should be taxed out the butt to do that. Some people can argue that eating meat has economic costs---so be prepared to pay more for that. Hell, even tofu has economic costs to grow the soybeans. Where will your sin tax stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. Some people will propose anything to keep from taxing the rich.
And they appreciate your efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. +1
not to mention that people don't want their piggish consumption of fossil fuels to ever get mentioned. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
62. don't forget "ecological" sins - which do far more damage to more people
if you want "sin taxes" - gasoline for your car should be about ten bucks a gallon to compensate for the damage people do who drive long distances or drive SUVs, etc.

Also, heating and cooling costs - it should costs thousands of dollars to heat a macmansion.

let's just make sure the things that cause the most damage get the most taxes.

...because, in this country, people don't ever want to think that living in a large house, driving a big car, living far away from work - those things cause far more damage than the things you mention - so why didn't you mention them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
64. Recouping externalized costs AND promoting healthier behavior is a win/win
libertarians don't like it- but hey, they cry and whine about anything sensible, like children do when they're told it's past their bedtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. What's the difference between sin, vice, and personal pleasure without "costs to society?"
And who decides? :shrug:

I say no -- tax the people who've so exploited workers/consumers, and hoarded wealth, to the point they're "sinfully rich." (Okay, maybe being rich isn't a sin, but GREED must be.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
68. That's a pretty short list. I'm sure you could come up with some others to make liberals look bad
for agreeing with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
70. Funny thing is, almost all of those (except maybe "go to prostitutes") are sins of the POOR --
Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 08:31 PM by smalll
which is always the way with sin taxes, isn't it?

Let's tax: down-hill skiing! It's dangerous - it causes a lot of broken bones, that only burden our health-care system. And it's totally unnecssary -- kind of like a sin, right? Plus, all the wasteful energy needed to manufature snow when it doesn't come as they would like.

Let's tax: mountain climbing! A no brainer! Think of all the expense we have to go to to rescue mountain climbers?

Let's tax: IMPORTED alcohol! Look, it's already evil alcohol, there's more than enough of that made here - and at least that benefits U.S. producers -- but all those Tuscan Reds, Beaujoulaix (sp?) Nouveau, authentically-Japanese Sake, Belgian beers, etc. etc -- shipping and or flying it over here??? Not exactly a "low carbon footprint!"

But most of all, most of all - let's tax FLYING! Getting on the goddamn plane - even if only in (horrors!) coach, helps to spew a lot more global warming gasses than us poor land-bound smokers could even dream of. So stop flouncing around the country on "business", keep those Macbooks at home (instead of self-importantly displayed across the tray-table) and take up video-conferencing -- and stop flying to fucking Khatmandu or Patagonia or whatnot for some "eco-tourism" when you get a few weeks off!

----

I bet THOSE kind of "sin taxes" don't sound so hot to a certain class of people, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. We already tax the daylights out of flying... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
76. If greed and power are sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
77. Send me a detailed list of your hobbies, choices, and activities.
I will be sure to propose some "sin" taxes that directly affect you.

Most people in favor of so called "sin" taxes are only in favor because it affects someone else.

At least be honest and call them a "them" tax as in it affects them not me.

I don't smoke, rarely drink, likely wouldn't use marijuana even if it was legal and I strongly oppose so called "sin taxes" which are just a nice way of saying crush the poor with massive sales taxes we could never get support for if it affected everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
78. I am not completely opposed to using the tax code as a policy tool, if that's what you mean. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC