Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quelle surprise !!!! Meg Whitman's ads aren't entirely truthful.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:22 PM
Original message
Quelle surprise !!!! Meg Whitman's ads aren't entirely truthful.....
from the Sacramento Bee:



Ad Watch: Whitman attack on Brown's record stretches truth
Published: Thursday, Jul. 15, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman is running a TV ad attacking Democratic nominee Jerry Brown's record on taxes and jobs and depicting him as a hand of unions and special interests. Following is text of the ad and an analysis by David Siders of The Bee Capitol Bureau:

Text

Audio taken from an ad by California Working Families for Jerry Brown for Governor 2010, an independent expenditure committee: Meg Whitman says she'll run California like her company.

Narrator: Seen this attack on Meg Whitman? Who are these people? They are the unions and special interests behind Jerry Brown. They want Jerry Brown because he won't rock the boat in Sacramento. He'll be the same as he ever was. High taxes. Lost jobs. Big pensions for state employees. The special interests have chosen their governor. How about you?

Analysis

The crux of the ad, that labor unions back Brown and are attacking Whitman on TV, is true. Its characterization of Brown, however, relies on a highly selective reading of his record.

The ad's "big pensions" claim refers to a 1977 bill in which Brown and the Legislature extended collective bargaining rights to state workers. The measure greatly bolstered the influence of public employee unions in California politics, and Brown in his campaign this year has touted his signature of the bill. But the pivotal moment for pension costs came in 1999, when the Legislature and then-Gov. Gray Davis upgraded benefits. Officials that year grossly underestimated the cost, believing pension investment funds would perform better than they did.

The claim that Brown won't "rock the boat" comes from remarks Brown made about having once been advised not to "rock the boat" in Sacramento. Brown said last month in Monterey, "There's a lot of wisdom to that." However, he went on to say, "Now, I'll rock it a little bit, because you got to get it on an even keel."

As governor, Brown signed a bill, supported by Republicans, increasing the gasoline tax by 2 cents a gallon. On the other hand, he also reduced state income taxes.

The unemployment rate in California, the basis for Whitman's "lost jobs" claim, was around 11 percent when Brown left office. But the nation was in a recession at the time, and the national unemployment rate was almost as high as in California.


http://www.sacbee.com/2010/07/15/2891240/adwatch-whitman-attack-on-browns.html#ixzz0to9fcz1T




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. A repuke - LIE? NOOOOO!!!!!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. No shit Sherlock. Those of us who were around
and cogent during Brown's first Governorship know her ads are nothing but projection, selective facts, hyperbole and out and out lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC