Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plagiarism charges dog Colorado gubernatorial candidate (R - Rick Perry endorsed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:38 AM
Original message
Plagiarism charges dog Colorado gubernatorial candidate (R - Rick Perry endorsed)

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/14/plagiarism-chargers-dogs-colorado-gubernatorial-candidate/?fbid=Y09lShoamaG#more-112996

(CNN) – The leading Republican gubernatorial candidate in Colorado apologized Tuesday for lifting passages from the writings of a state Supreme Court justice without attribution and is now staving off calls to quit the race.

Republican candidate and prominent Colorado lawyer Scott McInnis privately apologized to Colorado Supreme Court Justice Gregory Hobbs Tuesday for using several passages of Hobbs' work in producing a series of essays for which he was paid $300,000 to write, according to the Associated Press.

When the Denver Post first reported the instances of plagiarism earlier this week, McInnis, a former U.S. congressman and current partner of the international law firm Hogan Lovells, said the error was primarily the fault of his then-research assistant Rolly Fischer.

Meanwhile, the Hasan foundation is pledging to launch an investigation into the charge and possibly demand McInnis return the $300,000 he was paid.

But several state Democrats are calling on McInnis to quit the race, as is the Denver Post in an editorial Wednesday.

"The lifted work, examined in The Denver Post, constitutes inexcusable intellectual thievery. It is so damaging that we believe McInnis ought to drop out of the race," the Denver Post's editorial states. "Colorado's next governor should be a person of integrity, a trusted hand to lead the state through difficult times."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. He should quit and return the $300,000. He has always been a nasty
jerk, even without this new information. This is excellent news for Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. A common problem in the GOP - they are devoid of
original thoughts. Hope this sinks him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You have that right. I'll never forget listening to an economics professor
from the University of Denver on Channel 9 News. They wanted an expert opinion on the stimulus package. He called it economic child abuse. I sat there stunned, not believing that this supposed expert couldn't do better than using GOP talking points.

I had hoped to hear what a conservative expert had to say. Instead I got talking points that I could have heard from Pat Buchanan or any other talking head. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Most of the thinkers in the GOP died years ago and they are
lost and dependent on their sound bites. The dumbing down of America. It's really sad that politics has denigrated from healthy discussions on topics and policy to a he said/ she said gotcha atmosphere. Anyone wanting to debate issues is not taken seriously. They nominate clowns like Sarah Palin who can't even construct a basic sentence, let alone think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Awkwardly worded title, lol.
I spent about 30 seconds trying to figure out why the Colorado gubernatorial candidate was a dog, and what it could have plagiarized.

Then I realized "dog," in this case, was a verb.

:rofl:

I hope he drops out. I don't think Republican voters will care that he plagiarized something; only that he is a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loudmxr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should do the right thing and cut Hobbs in for a percentage.
You know its like lifting a sample for some rap. OG Steele would be down with that. Fee plus royalty plus 10% for the agent. Everybody gets some. Everybody's happy. No problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's blaming it on a "research assistant"?
That would only be credible if the "research assistant" did the actual writing, in which case the entire series of essays would be plagiarism ...
... or is that just "ghost writing"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Plagiarism charges dog a GOP candidate?
Don't they constitute a sign of qualification to BE a GOP candidate?

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC