Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox legal analyst: Bush should have been indicted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 03:22 PM
Original message
Fox legal analyst: Bush should have been indicted
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0712/fox-legal-analyst-bush-indicted/

By David Edwards
Monday, July 12th, 2010 -- 10:39 am

Fox News' senior judicial analyst made some surprising remarks Saturday that may go against the grain at his conservative network.

In a interview with Ralph Nader on C-SPAN's Book TV to promote his book Lies the Government Told You, Judge Andrew Napolitano said that President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney should have been indicted for "torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrant."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. and napolitano was born in 2008?
Why did he not push for this DURING the Bush admin:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never mind!
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 04:13 PM by Bluebear
Signed, Emily Litella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're thinking of the wrong person, its him, not her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Andrew, not Janet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Easier said than done, however. If legally possible, it could still
be a political hellhole. Though that would not stop Rs from doing it. Then again that's why the Rs are nasty and the voters are turning away from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. k,r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC