Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talking about cutting government spending is apparently like the board game "Operation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 08:38 PM
Original message
Talking about cutting government spending is apparently like the board game "Operation"
Remember that game, right? Where one had to cut out tiny problems (play on words, like "butterflies in stomach"), while at the same time avoiding the sides of the area they are cutting the problem out of?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_%28game%29

But yet, in real life, things aren't quite that entertaining.

Politicians and the 'liberal' media are always talking about removing this, cutting this program, privatizing that, etc. But yet, nobody wants to talk about the biggest part of our budget, which is military spending.

It's a third rail in our politics, a deadly electric buzz in real life, many times more severe than the buzzing noise one hears if they touch the sides in the board game mentioned earlier, ironically enough.

Everyone wants to take a sledgehammer to our social programs, BUT YOU'VE GOT TO DO IT CAREFULLY, lest you cut a military program and look like a pacifist.

It's not just teabaggers BTW, it's the media, it's the culture, and it's the government that all view our country and our futures as one big board game.

We need people willing to take a good look at the biggest part of our spending and start making some cuts. Because you really can't cut back if you don't cut the biggest part out. You aren't going to get buzzed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Many of them think life is just a computer game.
Edited on Thu Jul-08-10 08:51 PM by RandomThoughts
And a war game, so they think by having wars, it will keep their overlords happy. Really messed up delusion, and not all people think it, but it is probably part of the idea behind 'over there not over here'.

The idea if you do what some wrong overlord says you have to, then they wont treat you bad.

I figure it this way, if that is true, I got maybe 100 years of the BS to get through at most, but if they are wrong, and existence is actually good, then well things will work out ok for those that think and feel and try to make decisions on what is best not because of fear or other motivators. I will say that the Taliban's treatment of women is bad, it is a form of trying to make them property. But there are other ways to solve problems, or so I choose to hope.

I think you don't have an overlord when you don't do something just because someone says it.




Edit: Note the BS is what goes on in many places, and that does not have to be part of a persons thoughts.


AC/DC - Thunderstruck
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvoeeq-BH4w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does all this military spending benefit the country?
Even if you accept the claims of the right that World War II ended the Depression after the "failure" of the New Deal, how do you explain a recession during two wars? What's changed? Is everything being built by robots, or just a few well paid workers?

Every statistic about our military ends with "... times more than the rest of the world combined." Meanwhile, our greatest threat, terrorism, is being quietly handled by US and foriegn law enforcement. We do need to rethink all of our spending, and you're right, if we don't include military spending we're just playing games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. And when they "remove" some social program
it's like they're the girl in the commercial who takes out the "wrenched ankle", and we're her opponent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw-ZLTRuYuk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC