|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:53 AM Original message |
Just Passed - House Amendement (245-178) - PREVENTS ILLEGAL DOMESTIC WIRETAPPING BY GOVERNMENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. Just a signing statement away from being moot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. anyone else waiting for the signing statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Then impeach him son of a bitch. How much more are we going to fucking put up with? !!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Good question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not a veto-proof majority, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yes, I can't wait to see if my sorry rep is one of them! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiteinthewind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. No need for a veto, he will just add the signing statement. That is the way he circumvents the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's already illegal, and they already do it anyway. Passing another law accomplishes nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. This is good news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. The law already makes illegal wiretapping illegal. Like Bush cares. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. That's what I was thinking. If it was "illegal wiretapping" to begin with, what is it now...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-12-07 04:50 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. You and the rest of us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Consequences (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
8. How does this effect some douche who says he's above the law? (N/T) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. It doesn't prevent anything, just makes it illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
10. nothing but symbolic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maine_raptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
11. Step 1 of 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. It's been "Constitutional Crisis Time" since Dec. 2000.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
35. The way you reaffirm FISA and the 4th Amendment is to PROSECUTE THE VIOLATIONS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
12. its pretty sad that we need a law ordering NSA to follow another law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
13. Good news, thanks for posting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LizW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
14. Now illegal wiretapping is illegaler. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Yeah. That Bill 'O Rights is just a piece of paper too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Bingo. Summed it up. Still , glad they did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
16. No offense, but seeing these laws made and unmade and made again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
17. So we have 178 House members that support illegal wiretapping by the govt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. Excellent!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. woohoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. just an affirmation of a law * already broke..why not hold him accountable instead of passing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
22. This is good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AikidoSoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. The Bush admin will keep doing it. They don't care about law n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
25. not unless idiotboy signs it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
27. Wooooofuckingwhooo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
30. And that's why I give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Yesssssssssss! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-11-07 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
34. Actually the fact he hasn't used the signing statements in the 110th says a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-12-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
37. 'puke alway vote in blind lockstep, jumping through their own assholes. to give their Fuhrer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC