Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Growing influence of MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' seen with McChrystal story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:35 PM
Original message
Growing influence of MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' seen with McChrystal story
Joe Scarborough knew nothing about Rolling Stone magazine's profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal until he was on the air Tuesday, asked to read a "tease" promoting the story as "Morning Joe" headed into its first commercial break after its 6 a.m. start.

That changed, very quickly. Off the air, he grabbed an Associated Press account of what McChrystal had said, asked if NBC's Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski could be found to speak on it. He essentially made the magazine story and its implications the show's chief topic moving forward.

Barely more than a day later, President Barack Obama fired the Afghanistan war's top commander.

A phone call at 6:30 a.m. Tuesday startled Rolling Stone editor Eric Bates, telling him that a car would be by in 20 minutes to take him to the MSNBC studios. Bates had been booked for the show on Wednesday, to talk about a BP story and a "foreign policy story" that Rolling Stone had upcoming that he didn't identify beforehand. It was the McChrystal story, and it was breaking fast: The general and his aides had been quoted disparaging Obama and his national security aides.

During the hour he appeared, the "Morning Joe" audience of nearly 600,000 viewers far outpaced the season average of 377,000, the Nielsen Co. said.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hiNx_MH71YDMoMJIffMvVG43gJ8g

The AP's David Bauder writes today about the alleged "growing influence" of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," using last week's McChrystal coverage as anecdotal evidence of the show's success in Washington/media influence though not necessarily in viewer ratings:

While it's simplistic to think MSNBC's morning show influenced , it's no stretch that "Morning Joe" helped put McChrystal's words at the top of the national agenda. "Morning Joe" may not have a lot of viewers, but the show tends to be on in important places. Mike Allen, chief White House correspondent of Politico and a regular on the show, said that a senior Obama administration official told him, "I saw the funnel cloud forming on 'Morning Joe.'"

On the ratings front:

From Mon-Thurs of last week -- we won't have Friday's numbers until later this afternoon -- "Morning Joe" averaged 464,000 total viewers, which was the second-most in cable news, but still a far cry from FNC's "Fox & Friends," which averaged 964,000. In the demo, "Morning Joe" drew 130,000, the smallest A25-54 audience in cable news.

For the month of May, the program averaged 406,000 total viewers and 119,000 in the demo, with the same rank in both categories.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/morning_joes_growing_influence_166048.asp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank goodness for Morning Joe.
Whew!

:*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What ever would we do without him??
Edited on Mon Jun-28-10 04:30 PM by Winterblues
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The mere thought is unbearable.
Unbearable, I say. :*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I turned MJ on at a little past 6:30 and Joe and Mika seemed a little stunned but
starting to pull it together. After a bit Eric Bates appeared, looking a little rough, but very articulate...he'd obviously gotten himself prepared to talk about the story.

It was kinda fun to watch it all unfold...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's just a pathetic boys club that is bound by the mediocrity of it's hosts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. First to comment on the air sets the tone.
CNN has lost its standing, and Moaning-Joe has steeped into the void. They present the show much like a morning drive-time radio show, and it has caught on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. When the guests are good, I like to watch. When they're bad, it gets turned off.
Simple as that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Averaged 464,000 total viewers...."
So something that less than one quarter of one percent of the population watches is considered "influential. Even Fox and Friends is a scary one half of one percent.

Shows you just how ridiculously insular our political culture is. A ridiculously small group of people talking to and about each other, patting themselves on the back.

And people wonder why the country is in the shape it is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC