Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Colossal Fracking Mess: The dirty truth behind the new natural gas.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:00 AM
Original message
A Colossal Fracking Mess: The dirty truth behind the new natural gas.
Excellent long article in Vanity Fair

http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2010/06/fracking-in-pennsylvania-201006?currentPage=all

Early on a spring morning in the town of Damascus, in northeastern Pennsylvania, the fog on the Delaware River rises to form a mist that hangs above the tree-covered hills on either side. A buzzard swoops in from the northern hills to join a flock ensconced in an evergreen on the river’s southern bank.

Stretching some 400 miles, the Delaware is one of the cleanest free-flowing rivers in the United States, home to some of the best fly-fishing in the country. More than 15 million people, including residents of New York City and Philadelphia, get their water from its pristine watershed. To regard its unspoiled beauty on a spring morning, you might be led to believe that the river is safely off limits from the destructive effects of industrialization. Unfortunately, you’d be mistaken. The Delaware is now the most endangered river in the country, according to the conservation group American Rivers.

That’s because large swaths of land—private and public—in the watershed have been leased to energy companies eager to drill for natural gas here using a controversial, poorly understood technique called hydraulic fracturing. “Fracking,” as it’s colloquially known, involves injecting millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals, many of them toxic, into the earth at high pressures to break up rock formations and release natural gas trapped inside. Sixty miles west of Damascus, the town of Dimock, population 1,400, makes all too clear the dangers posed by hydraulic fracturing. You don’t need to drive around Dimock long to notice how the rolling hills and farmland of this Appalachian town are scarred by barren, square-shaped clearings, jagged, newly constructed roads with 18-wheelers driving up and down them, and colorful freight containers labeled “residual waste.” Although there is a moratorium on drilling new wells for the time being, you can still see the occasional active drill site, manned by figures in hazmat suits and surrounded by klieg lights, trailers, and pits of toxic wastewater, the derricks towering over barns, horses, and cows in their shadows.

The real shock that Dimock has undergone, however, is in the aquifer that residents rely on for their fresh water. Dimock is now known as the place where, over the past two years, people’s water started turning brown and making them sick, one woman’s water well spontaneously combusted, and horses and pets mysteriously began to lose their hair.

snip>

“It was so bad sometimes that my daughter would be in the shower in the morning, and she’d have to get out of the shower and lay on the floor” because of the dizzying effect the chemicals in the water had on her, recalls Craig Sautner, who has worked as a cable splicer for Frontier Communications his whole life. She didn’t speak up about it for a while, because she wondered whether she was imagining the problem. But she wasn’t the only one in the family suffering. “My son had sores up and down his legs from the water,” Craig says. Craig and Julie also experienced frequent headaches and dizziness.

By October 2009, the D.E.P. had taken all the water wells in the Sautners’ neighborhood offline. It acknowledged that a major contamination of the aquifer had occurred. In addition to methane, dangerously high levels of iron and aluminum were found in the Sautners’ water.

snip>

Still, Carullo and the other activists of Damascus Citizens face an uphill battle because of the corporate and political interests stacked against them, the vast amount of money at stake, and the dynamics of our nation’s energy-policy debate. “What it is we’re doing here is trying to dismantle the whole propaganda machine that the industry is involved in,” says Carullo. “For example, ‘natural gas is the bridge to the future.’ That’s the industry’s claim. Only problem is, there’s nothing natural about this, because it’s the most unnatural thing you can imagine—hauling around tons of chemicals, taking pure water and turning it into the worst industrial waste on the planet!”

Read More http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2010/06/fracking-in-pennsylvania-201006?currentPage=all#ixzz0raPL5Iee


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone watch Josh Fox's documentary "Gasland" last night?
It's about the tragic and horrendous results of fracking everywhere it's been done in the country. Hard to put into words how angry it made me. Thing is, I know some folks in rural NE PA who recently had a gas will drilled on their property, along with many of their neighbors. I'm guessing they're being paid well, just hope they're ready for what's about to happen to the water they drink and air they breathe. I highly recommend watching "Gasland".

Thanks for your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i saw him last night on stewart... just another WTF. told hubby take a lighter to water in sink
he said.... there is the lighter, go for it. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Makes me sick even reading about it
I did some marketing for the natural gas industry some years ago. They kept telling me that while oil would eventually run out, there was plenty of natural gas supply available for a long time to come. I guess this is what they meant.

It's not worth the horrendous environmental and social cost.

One solution would be to make the consequences so costly to fracking companies that they go out of business. However, with corporations running our country, I have little hope that this would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. WaPo and NYT really go to town on Fox.
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 10:21 AM by bushmeister0
Both reviews invoke Michael Moore, and you know what that means. . .

NYT: "Like a less manic Michael Moore, Mr. Fox capitalizes on people’s refusals to be interviewed, presenting several montages in which he is seen supposedly making repeated, fruitless phone calls to corporate offices...what we don’t see with any real specificity is how these people were approached or what they were told about the film, leaving it difficult to make judgments about their refusals to appear on camera." Yes, because "serious" journalists always give a full accounting of the methods they used to get interviews.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/21/arts/television/21gasland.html?scp=1&sq=gasland&st=cse

WaPo: "In the Michael Moore spirit of things, Fox provides many glimpses of his attempts to get gas company executives and PR people to return his phone calls, including the predictable scene of a man in a suit removing the clip-on microphone and abruptly ending an interview. Although this is presented as sticking-it-to-The-Man material, it instead hints at Fox's failings as an amateur journalist."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/20/AR2010062003000.html

The WaPo fails to point out the "man in the suit" is Penn. Department of Environmental Protection secretary John Hanger, whose department is facing a "25 percent budget cut and layoffs of 350 full-time employees."

The WaPo also faults Fox for putting the reviewer through a "google quagmire in search of some answers, which, I can report after a few hopeless hours of looking, you won't easily get." Wonder why that could be? Could it be that neither the WaPo or the NYT has done any work on this story????? Hmmm????

But have no fear NYC residents, your water is going to be just fine, "the state recently tightened regulations governing drilling in that area, at least temporarily," according to the NYT. Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How did they explain WATER ON FIRE?
Did they invoke Pixar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. In NYS both the D and the R for Gov want fracking
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC