Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Party 'confessional' in Playboy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:43 PM
Original message
Tea Party 'confessional' in Playboy.
The new Playboy magazine has an anonymous confessional from a K Street consultant who lifts the curtain on many of the politically crafty, somewhat seedy underpinnings of the Tea Party movement.

The article has not received much attention. But its contents, if true, are illustrative and fascinating. The consultant, who doesn't identify for whom he actually works, paints a picture of a movement that has strength in its legions of followers outside the Beltway but harnesses its power from the "black arts" of politicking.

Among the author's various claims are the following:

Tea Party strategists have "quietly acquired Service Employees International Union shirts to wear at Tea Party rallies," which he or she describes as the equivalent of "handing out TSA uniforms in Kabul."

Sarah Palin isn't the leader of the movement. Big Government's Andrew Brietbart is. "Breitbart is one of them, except smarter, better connected and angrier; compared with him, Palin is Las Vegas dinner theater. That's why he is loved by Tea Partyers in a way Palin can never hope to be loved."

Actual elected officials are bowing down to the Tea Party throng in ever-growing numbers. Describing a meeting he held with his finance team at the Richard Nixon suite at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington D.C. the consultant writes that members of Congress came in and asked for a list of what to do. "The second meeting drew 10 congressmen," the consultant writes. "There we sat, inside the Capitol Hill Club (which shares the building that houses the Republican National Committee), sharing ideas on how we can work together. The third meeting drew 17 congressmen."

Strategists deliberately try to stir up rage among average Americans, calculating that it's much easier to push a political movement if it's deeply frightened than if it's entirely hopeful. "We're playing to the reptilian brain rather than the logic centers, so we look for key words and images to leverage the intense rage and anxiety of white working-class conservatives," the consultant writes. "In other words, I talk to the same part of your brain that causes road rage."

Along these lines, the strategists behind the Tea Party movement are using variable-print technology to send out thank-you notes "from an imaginary Wall Street executive to working-class taxpayers."

The Tea Party is distrusting if not disdainful of the conspiracy theorists with which they are often associated. The consultant writes that during one candidate-interview process, two simple questions are asked. "(1) Are you a birther? (2) Are you a truther? If the answer is anything but "no" or "hell no," the conversation ends right there. If the candidate answers correctly, the conversation continues."

Because it's written without identification, the piece has to be read with a measure of skepticism. That said, much of what is written seems grounded in reality. The Tea Party movement described by the consultant doesn't come off as inherently outlandish. In fact, there is a sense of admiration in the prose. "This cause is worthier and more real than anything I've done in the past," the consultant writes. "I'm all in."

But the piece certainly dispels the myth -- if it still existed -- that the Tea Party is some sort of folksy grassroots movement merely trying to add a modicum of sense to today's corrupt political process. In fact, the movement gets giddy pleasure from sticking it to institutional powers but is quietly dependent on the type of politicking they deplore, as even the author admits.

"The worst thing I can say about the Tea Party I work for is that it can make lots of noise but can't win without professional help. I love the irony of helping run this organization from the St. Regis Bar (one of D.C.'s fanciest hotels)."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/18/tea-party-confessional-ru_n_617418.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meh
I don't read Playboy for the articles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that's right.... use an excuse not to educate yourself
dumb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. *Facepalm*
The reason I am as educated as I am is because I don't automatically believe anything anyone says. When an anonymous, unsourced article tells me exactly what I *want* to believe, I get *more* skeptical, not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. um... you didn't say that... you said you didn't read Playboy
without any explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Explaining the joke ruins the joke
But I'll ruin it anyways.

I said I didn't read Playboy *for the articles* - implying that I read Playboy for some reason *other than the articles*. Now, let's think for a minute: is there anything in a Playboy, other than the articles, that might cause me to read it?

In actual fact, I do read some articles in Playboy, but the vast majority of them are utter rubbish, for entertainment purposes only. Like WWN or the Inquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I don't get it.
I don't read Playboy, I just look at the pictures of sexy naked women. but each to his own, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I read it for the articles and to look at nekkid women.
I like to cover all the bases. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elias7 Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Well, I thought your joke was a clever twist of the old adage
"I get it for the articles" Maybe we're dated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Does it contain print?
I better go check......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick and Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. "In other words, I talk to the same part of your brain that causes road rage."
"We're playing to the reptilian brain rather than the logic centers, so we look for key words and images to leverage the intense rage and anxiety of white working-class conservatives," the consultant writes.

No kidding, Sherlock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. if nothing else, that quote is 1,000,000% true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. This thread is useless without pictures...oh wait. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I read it the other day and found it fascinating
I was especially interested in the contempt that operatve has for the tea partiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Was it not already known that the teaparties were
organized by the corporate front group freedomworks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Your link is hilarious!
:rofl:

Sorry. Carry on. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Well the tea party folks have never admitted it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. May their hubris be their downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thats overwhelming proof that the Tea Party crowd is full of crap.
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 06:45 PM by Mr. Sparkle
All the media organizations who gave these Tea party freaks a lot of publicity over the last year, should be forced to run this as their number one story, while profusely apologizing at the same time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is interesting:

Causing mayhem is not limited to dealing with the press. We’ve quietly acquired Service Employees International Union shirts to wear at Tea Party rallies. For big labor, that’s like handing out TSA uniforms in Kabul. And at a rally in St. Louis this March, fake SEIU protesters joined the Tea Party protest.


Remember Kenneth Gladney?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=6248601

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=6260889

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=6285670
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Another waypoint on the trip to fascism
Don't have the link handy, but when the regressive angry mob allies with out-of-power elites, well, that's not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC