Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Three Card Monte game goes on: Air Force plans to privatize housing at Warren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:39 AM
Original message
The Three Card Monte game goes on: Air Force plans to privatize housing at Warren
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 06:48 AM by unhappycamper
Air Force plans to privatize housing at Warren
The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday Jun 17, 2010 14:59:45 EDT

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The Air Force plans to privatize housing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base.

Officials say the move will save money and also provide better housing to service members.

Officials say they don’t have the money to keep up with maintenance on the units, which were built in the 1950s and ’60s.

About 350 units are expected to be renovated, and 450 will be demolished and replaced.

The work will be done as part of a bigger project involving bases in California, Montana and Missouri.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. "save money" . . . I love that argument
introduce profits . . . and money will be saved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have heard that farce since raygun
all you get is grift and corruption..i mean look at haliburton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Even with no corruption, profit is an added cost
Down the road, they'll wonder why costs have risen to at least double or triple their projections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Today, AF housing.
Tomorrow, the AF.

New movie title: Privitized Top Gun. Catchy, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually a pretty smart move that will save money
The money saved will be in time spent by Air Force Personnel spending time keeping the housing up. Instead, those people will be able to focus on the mission of the Air Force rather than upkeep of housing.

It will improve the local economy, too.

Win win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. why do you assume those keeping up the housing are the same ones that
are involved with the operations roles? They are a completely different group of airmen. You don't take a civil engineer or electrician or plumber and stick them in a cockpit.

Local economy also improves with military personnel doing this work.

not a win-win.

All this privatization leads to higher costs due to the newly introduced profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. They contract out the maintenance today
AF personnel manage all of that.

That management is what is being outsourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. so add an element of profit . . . how again does that make it cheaper?
you don't divert this AF management into operational roles. You cut those positions . . . and pay for the service from a profit-driven agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. The cost of having Air Force Officers managing the contracting of maintenance
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 08:40 AM by WeDidIt
through multiple vendors is higher than the cost of paying a single source to manage that for you.

The management company has an economy of scale because your properties are not the only properties the management company manages.

This reduces cost overall and keeps the Air Force focused on core competencies. The management company is also capable of providing a higher level of service at that reduced cost.

This is standard business practice and definitely saves money. I cannot tell you how many times I've been able to reduce costs for corporations I've worked for by outsourcing certain support functions. We're talking millions upon millions of dollars.

It works and it works well. The practice has a proven ROI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. the quality of Halliburton's work is a perfect example. . . .
just what we need . . . . more KR&Bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. It will be a local company
I can pretty much guarantee that.

Halliburton got it's no bid contract from the Bush admin because it had a one up on all other companies, it was allowed to operate in a war zone.

F.E. Warren AFB is NOT a war zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. aand Halliburton is not alone in it's goal to maximize profits by cutting costs
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 10:55 AM by DrDan
that is the goal of ALL corporations.


and why do you assume it will be a local company? The link states "The work will be done as part of a bigger project involving bases in California, Montana and Missouri".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Will Halliburton be installing the showers?
What could possibly go wrong?

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/3780160.html



WASHINGTON - A U.S. Army doctor serving in Iraq has linked a small outbreak of bacterial infections among U.S. troops to allegedly contaminated water supplied by Houston-based Halliburton Co.

In the latest broadside against Halliburton and its performance in Iraq, Senate Democrats produced an e-mail Friday from Capt. A. Michelle Callahan, a family physician serving at Qayyarah Airfield West, recounting how she treated six infections over a two-week period in January, at the same time she was noticing the water in base showers was cloudy and foul-smelling.

Follow-up testing of the water soldiers were using to bathe, shave and even brush their teeth revealed evidence of coliform and E. coli bacteria, Callahan wrote in an e-mail to a staffer for the Democratic Policy Committee, led by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D.

Halliburton subsidiary KBR was responsible for treating water at that base, under a contract to provide logistical support to U.S. troops.

<snip>

But the water was still cloudy, Callahan said. Further investigation revealed that the water the troops were using was actually wastewater from a purification unit, she wrote.


http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/22/electrocution-death-called-negligent-homicide/



January 22nd, 2009
Electrocution death called 'negligent homicide'
Posted: 03:22 PM ET

From Scott Bronstein and Abbie Boudreau
CNN Special Investigations Unit
WASHINGTON (CNN) - The U.S. Army Criminal Investigations Division (CID) has changed the manner of death for a soldier electrocuted while showering at his base in Iraq from "accidental" to "negligent homicide," according to an e-mail from CID obtained by CNN.

Investigators are blaming KBR, the largest U.S. contractor in Iraq, and two KBR supervisors for the incident, saying "they failed to ensure that work was being done by qualified electricians and plumbers, and to inspect the work that was being conducted."

CNN first reported the story of the death of Sgt. Ryan Maseth, a highly decorated, 24-year-old Green Beret, last spring. The Pentagon and its contract agency have declined requests for an interview to answer questions about Maseth's death or other similar cases.

KBR has told CNN in the past it found no link between its work and the reported electrocutions and has denied responsibility in lawsuits filed against the company.



Why don't we ever learn? I wish Milton Friedman would stay dead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. is there any easy money involved?
of course they will be there. Millions and millions are involved across the world.

Taxpayer money is their specialty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. I wonder if they'll bother to change their name.
People seem to have accepted privatization as inevitable anyway. Maybe no one will even complain if they see the usual suspects pulling their crap in the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Another friend of a high ranking official makes out like a thief
Oh wait they are. We spend our money to build it and a public official just gives it to their buddy so he can make a profit from it.

Isn't America great?

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. I thought we were going to stop privatizing our military.
Just another way to filter taxpayer money through a rich man's pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. No money to do maintainence, but money to pay somebody to do it?
Yeah, that makes sense. Contracting out is an idea whose time has long passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. There will be less maintenance
The units are going to be "renovated" at taxpayer expense before being privatized so there won't be as much maintenance needed. Clever huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. This is why I'm not a millionaire
my second grade teacher said I'd never amount to anything...poor penmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. I lived in a duplex at FEWarren when I was in the 4th grade
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 08:27 AM by SoCalDem
Ugly little flat-roofed box..Had to be all of 900 sq ft.. I feel for anyone who's living there now, if that housing is still being used:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC