Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama judicial nominee John McConnell passes Senate Judiciary on a bipartisan vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:06 PM
Original message
Obama judicial nominee John McConnell passes Senate Judiciary on a bipartisan vote
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 09:34 PM by usregimechange

John J. McConnell, Jr., Managing partner, Motley Rice LLC.
Nominee for the United States District Court, District of Rhode Island
51 Years Old.


Senator Sessions is opposing his nomination because:
  • he and his wife have contributed almost 700,000 to Democratic candidates
  • he was treasure of the RI Democratic committee
  • he once was the Director of Planned Parenthood
  • for filling a lawsuit based on a "novel public nuisance theory" against corporations who put lead paint in children's toys
  • that the US Chamber of Commerce opposes him


  • Senator Whitehouse spoke in support noting that he:
  • has devoted time to Crossroads Rhode Island a shelter for women and the homeless
  • is opposed by the paint industry who he helped hold accountable
  • has represented poised kids
  • is well respected in Rhode Island


  • Voting yes: 13
    Whitehouse, Klobuchar, Kaufman, Franken, Leahy, Kohl, Feinstein, Feingold, Schumer, Specter, Graham, Durbin, Cardin.

    Voting no: 6
    Sessions, Hatch, Grassley, Kyl, Cornyn, Coburn.



    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
    Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:10 PM
    Response to Original message
    1. Why the hell did Durbin and Cardin oppose him?
    n/t.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:14 PM
    Response to Reply #1
    3. Errr..Good Job Dems!
    Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 09:39 PM by MadMaddie
    :blush:
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:33 PM
    Response to Reply #3
    4. Sorry, typo, Dems all vote for
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:39 PM
    Response to Reply #4
    7. he..he.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:14 PM
    Response to Reply #1
    10. Never mind. They didn't oppose him.
    n/t.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:11 PM
    Response to Original message
    2. Durbin, Cardin??? I need to find out what their beefs were. nt
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:35 PM
    Response to Reply #2
    5. Sorry, they both voted for him, Cardin even spoke in support at the hearing
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:39 PM
    Response to Reply #5
    6. PHEW! Thanks! nt
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:56 PM
    Response to Reply #6
    8. Didn't mean to make your head explode!
    :headbang:
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:09 PM
    Response to Original message
    9. Graham voted yes by proxy, plus Kyl said he would support blocking a vote on the floor
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:48 PM
    Response to Original message
    11. BLT: Senate Committee Advances Motley Rice Partner for Judgeship
    The Senate Judiciary Committee voted largely along party lines today to endorse plaintiffs' lawyer John McConnell Jr. for the federal district court in Rhode Island.

    Republican senators attacked McConnell as anti-business, picking up on intense criticism from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, while Democrats called those depictions cartoonish and touted support from McConnell’s home state.

    McConnell is the Providence, R.I., managing partner of South Carolina-based Motley Rice. He took a lead role in major cases involving asbestos, and the Rhode Island attorney general’s office hired him on a contingency basis to handle litigation against the lead-paint and tobacco industries, with mixed results.

    His nomination, which now heads to the full Senate, has shaped up as a major fight because of the Chamber’s involvement. As The National Law Journal reported, Chamber officials said Wednesday they will count senators’ votes on McConnell when they compile their rankings.

    http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/06/senate-committee-advances-motley-rice-partner-for-judgeship.html
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:39 PM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC