Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghan minerals could turn war's tide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:37 PM
Original message
Afghan minerals could turn war's tide
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 03:44 PM by superconnected
Source: CCN News

(CNN) -- The news that Afghanistan's mineral wealth could exceed $1 trillion is an important opportunity for both Kabul and Washington to change the narrative from counterinsurgency to locally controlled sustainable development.

By doing so, the government of Hamid Karzai and the Obama administration can leverage a range of converging interests in South and Central Asia to put Afghanistan and the region finally on the only viable path to security -- rising economic prosperity in the larger region.

Natural resources are both a blessing and a curse. For some countries strong government and civil society can manage them so the larger society benefits and profits are invested in the human resources of the country. The BP oil spill notwithstanding, this has been the case for the United States, Canada, Norway and the United Kingdom.

For many other countries, natural resource wealth has been a curse. The Democratic Republic of the Congo has been at war over its resources for more than 15 years. Angola's oil wealth fueled a multidecade civil war, and Iraq's strategic position at the heart of the Persian Gulf oil patch led to a dictatorship that was both sponsored by the United States and then destroyed by it.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/06/15/doherty.afghan.minerals/index.html



We all wondered why the press release of old news - minerals content in Afghanistan, was shoved in our face, now we know. And we were right - justification of keeping us in Afghanistan propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. withdraw the US military and let corporate CEOs duke it out with the afghanis nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1,000,000
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 03:46 PM by YOY
Even if we could justify using our tax dollars and military lives it benefits the American people zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquuatch55 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Makes you wonder if the US didn't know this all along, with their Imperialistic agenda in the Middle
East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are you fuckn kidding me? You think Afghans trust corrupt Kabul to manage these resources?
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 03:52 PM by Oregone
I'm sorry, but Karzai AND the US have thus far proven to be totally untrustworthy, as far as fairly distributing proceeds from natural wealth to the inhabitants of the country. If anything, this gives the dirty Taliban something to campaign on.

I don't know. I don't get it. Maybe its because I'm Western. But this seems like BS to me. Just because its being repeated, ad nauseam, about changing the war's tide, it doesn't make it true. Now these people might be able to envision a future, like their long past, without some western country ordering them around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, I don't get two things - 1. why the thead was moved, 2. why we can't question the mods.
I mean it was latest breaking news yesterday when I posted it. It's relevant. Why was it moved from LBN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquuatch55 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank corporate owned media!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC