Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much oil does it take to ship all of our goods from China?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:05 AM
Original message
How much oil does it take to ship all of our goods from China?
As long as they plan on taxing us for polluting meanwhile all our goods are coming from China where Al Gore and Bill Clinton sent all of our jobs as well...I'm not listening.

When Al Gore is ready to come out and APOLOGIZE for sending all our jobs overseas meanwhile allowing unregulated pollution to continue ...somewhere else....you see we all breathe the same air, you can't just pollute over there and pretend we are not responsible.

When Al Gore is ready to start charging Walmart and Target and all of the other corporations that buy all their products overseas tax for their pollution then I won't mind paying more taxes...but that's not how it works...with 'free' trade they don't pay taxes that's why they all moved....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. and while I'm at it....
How much oil does it use to go to war?

When will these politicians start owning up to their own policies and the real cause of pollution and waste?

Instead, like everything else (9/11- they hate US for our freedom, gulf gusher-it's all our fault cause we drive)
they want to blame us, and then make us pay the price....again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Military uses most of the oil -- BP partners with government in WAR . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very little.
Bunker fuel is cheap, and ocean-going freighters haul massive loads for little in energy costs.


The Defense Dept. is the real culprit when it comes to oil use.

Number one single biggest user of petroleum on Earth is the DoD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Even if the fuel was free
All of our goods are coming from somewhere with little to no environmental regulations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I understand that bunker fuel does not
burn very cleanly, thereby causing a lot more pollution.

I may be wrong, but that's what I remember ... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. it figures
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Short answer: a lot.
Al Gore doesn't have the power to "charge" anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Al Gore has the power to recognize a mistake and work to make it right
Has Al Gore mentioned pollution in China at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't know. Was it my turn to watch him?
Again, you said he should "charge" Chinese importers. If he as a private citizen has the power to do that, then so do you. Why don't YOU charge these importers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I wasn't putting you on the spot- sorry- just asking in general
He no longer has the power to change policy, but he can certainly speak about it and he has the ear of many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. How much do we import from China? How much do we export?
What percentage of total imports and exports do these represent for each country? If they were replaced with domestic production in each case what would be the net change in energy consumption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is a good question
and the answer might well be our solution to the pollution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. But opening up China provided profits for Bush, Kissinger, Eagleburger, etal . . . .
and in return for the trade and helping to wipe out jobs in America, they

also got to finance our debt!!

We can't pull the trade from China now . . . unless we began to stabilize our debt --

and China can't pull their support for our debt without sacrificing the trade.


Now, in the case of the Vatican ... we're financing their "faith-based" religious

organizations -- RCC has the majority of them -- and they are helping swing our elections

to the right! Another fair trade! Meanwhile, RCC also gets to pay off their pedophile

lawsuits!!


Mexico -- we let them finance our debt -- and provide trade/profits for elites.

They agree not to use their money to create jobs for Mexicans in Mexico!!


Ah -- the beauty of it all!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. If the spent the stimulus building high speed electric trains
that sure would have saved a lot of oil


but it is always our fault, and we have to pay the price....always...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Capitalism is a suicidal concept . . .
we have to stop judging everything by the yardstick of a dollar bill --

and profits!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. and start with changing the idea that consumption is the goal in life
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 12:08 PM by happy_liberal
We have so much 'stuff' in the world already, it is time to just reuse. If everyone started shopping at thrift stores, ebay used purchases from other Americans, Amazon marketplace used items...almost everything you want is already out there somewhere in someone's closet or garage taking up space.

And then we need to stop wanting so much. Clearly money and things are not providing happiness because the evil greedy people just want more and more and are never happy. They key is being happy with what we have. And we have so much. If you look at the big picture, buying a 50lb bag of flour to eat for 2 months is so easy compared to what our ancestors had to go through. They would laugh at the stress filled consumption oriented death trap of a society we have created for ourselves.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You're describing a new "60's youth revolution" ... it would be wonderful--!!!
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 12:18 PM by defendandprotect
The right wing tried to belittle it by calling it the "sexual revolution" --

it was in part -- but it was about much more --

Here's Mae Brussel on that --


"I realized that in this country we had a revolution--of housing, food, hair style, clothing, cosmetics, transportation, value systems, religion--it was an economic revolution, affecting the cosmetics industry, canned foods, the use of land; people were delivering their own babies, recycling old clothes, withdrawing from spectator sports. They were breaking the barriers where white and black could rap in 1967. This was the year of the Beatles, the summer of Sergeant Pepper, the Monterey Pop Festival, Haight-Ashbury, make your own candle and turn off the electricity, turn on with your friends and laugh--that's what life was all about."

http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussell%20Articles/Ballad%20of%20Mae%20Brussell.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. my hero
"I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. n the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life's roadside; but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Completely agree . . . but who are you quoting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Martin Luther King Jr-
love that man! He was and is America's prophet and we still have much to learn from him...

I listen to him all the time
http://www.benfrank.net/nuke/Free_Peace_mp3s.html#mlk

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Sad I didn't recognize it .....
and a large part of it also sounds like the Nobel Prize scientists making the

same kind of plea for change to save the planet --

Thanks for the link -- I'll save it --

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. We need a new revolution- no doubt at all!
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 12:33 PM by happy_liberal
Wake up you ole hippies and wake up your children!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. In 2006 the US In 2006 US Military consumed 117 million barrels or 320,000 barrels per day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. whoa!
In 2006 Air Force consumed around 2.6 billion gallons of jet-fuel which is the same amount of fuel U.S. airplanes consumed during WWII (between December 1941 and August 1945). The mighty B52 bomber (pictured above) consumes 3300 gallons per hour, the F16 Falcon burns 800 gallons per hour and the KC-135 Statotanker an aerial refueling tanker aircraft consumes 2650 gallons per hour.

2) The Department of Defense is the single largest consumer of petroleum in the U.S and the US military is the biggest purchaser of oil in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. If it were a separate country, the Pentagon would rank 37th in oil consumption
ahead of Portugal. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. A good question... Kick and Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC