Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking down the President's Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:32 AM
Original message
Breaking down the President's Speech
It seems that not everyone either heard President Obama's speech, or didn't listen closely. So, here are some of the things he actually said last night, along with my brief comments:

Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology. That’s why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge -- a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.


President Obama recognizes, as we all do now, just how horrible this disaster is and that we don't really know how to stop it. So, he's got lots of people working on solutions.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced. And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it’s not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days. The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.


He recognizes just how enormous the problem is and knows that it will take a long, long time to repair the damage.

But make no mistake: We will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.


President Obama declares his dedication to using every resource available and to make BP pay for their damage.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward: what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.


What follows will be the plans Obama has to address the problems and solutions for those problems.

First, the cleanup. From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history -- an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost 40 years of experience responding to disasters. We now have nearly 30,000 personnel who are working across four states to contain and clean up the oil. Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf. And I’ve authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, they’re ready to help clean the beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims -- and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible.


Many Resources have already been deployed, and more are on the way. The governors have the go ahead to activate National guard units.

Because of our efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been removed from the water through burning, skimming and other collection methods. Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil. We’ve approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try to stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we’re working with Alabama, Mississippi and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines.

As the cleanup continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need. Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise. I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip. So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it. If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them.

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no matter how effective our response is, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.


Part of the job is being accomplished. Nothing he said here is untrue. But, he knows that nothing of this size is going to operate flawlessly. He asks to be informed when things don't go as they should, and promises to fix them. He also recognizes that this is not a short-term project. All true.

Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent third party.


Note that the President is not going to "ask." He is going to tell BP how it's going to be.

And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment.

I make that commitment tonight. Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, who is also a former governor of Mississippi and a son of the Gulf Coast, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible. The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists and other Gulf residents. And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region.


Here comes the Navy. Restoration needs a plan. Everyone involved will participate, and BP will pay. Not "may" pay. Will pay.

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency. But it’s now clear that the problem there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow. And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency -- Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General. And his charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog -- not its partner.


MMS Failed. Initial attempts didn't solve the problem. A new leadership is taking charge, and is charged with turning the agency into a real watchdog, not the enabler created by previous administrations. That's a good thing.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we’ve talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked -- not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.


Peak oil and the refusal of previous administrations to do anything to deal with this.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And there are some who believe that we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy -– because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.


We can't afford not to act, says the President.

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fair hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is somehow too big and too difficult to meet. You know, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is the capacity to shape our destiny -– our determination to fight for the America we want for our children. Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don’t yet know precisely how we’re going to get there. We know we’ll get there.


The President expresses his determination to treat this as a prime task, as we have done in the past with other daunting challenges. He declares that he will not settle for less than maximum effort.

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face. This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again. What sees us through -– what has always seen us through –- is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it.


A call for strength and resilience in dealing with this as we have dealt with other big problems. A statement of belief in the American People to rise to the occasion.

Tonight, we pray for that courage. We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.


Yes, the President is a Christian. So he prays for success in this venture. Most Americans are Christians, and they're praying too. I'm not a Christian, but I have zero problem with people praying, if that's what they believe.


I don't see weakness in this speech. I see strength. I've only included excerpts. If you want to read the entire transcript, and I can't imagine that anyone wouldn't, you can find it at the link below:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-nation-bp-oil-spill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mineral man, it does not matter what he said.
All he can do is control what is happening above the sea surface. BP and our very own Government have lied to us for a reason...and that reason is because the situation is FUBAR.

Also, he is speaking to BP too late. Do you know how long it will take him to set up an escrow account with an independent third party? This should have been handled by the US Government, and it should have been done a few months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I think you're right that BP has been lying to us, probably the govt. as well.
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 11:32 AM by BurtWorm
But I don't think the govt. should be spending a dime on this--although, for bending over backwards to greenlight this disaster for BP, they do owe the people and other life forms around the Gulf some damages. I wish our government, acting on our behalf, would seize BP and liquidate it and use those funds to buy the best engineering in the world to stop the fucking leak already. Doesn't that seem to be priority number one? Stop the oil from escaping any more into the environment, for chrissake! Easier said than done, it's true. But I'm with you in wanting--or needing--to see real action on this yesterday--or weeks ago, better yet.

Granted, Obama only has so much power constitutionally. The Congress has only so much power. The DOJ, only so much power. Odd, though, that Congress et al will look the other way when the "threat" is hypothetical terrorism to give the government all power at its disposal. But when the threat is real oil, all thumbs get planted deep up the asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's stunning that 100% of the pundits didn't hear any of that
They made no attempt at all.

Last night's media "analysis" was the clearest FAIL I have ever witnessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, his speech with a shakey and fearful voice was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. That is bullshit. He didn't have a "shakey and fearful voice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You're absolutely correct. He did not. He spoke in a calm, firm
manner, as he always does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Looks like I made a good "ignore" choice. Thanks.
Shakey and fearful?? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. There are so many incorrect things being posted about
Obama's speech. I sat and listened to the whole thing. It was a good speech. Now, BP is putting $20B in escrow, after today's meeting with Obama. He did exactly what he said he'd do. I don't see any of the critics posting that.

Sometimes I wonder...I really do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. I watched it this morning and read it at the President's site
Before I read the pundits on DU and othe USA TV media and gave it a good rating and said it was a good start
Now, lets get to work I said and he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. He's already started acting on what he said he'd do in that speech.
I guess it wasn't as weak a speech as some say. BP is doing just what the President said he'd require them to do. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. I know. Just pushing the worst crap that supports RW memes and is completely dishonest.
As the saying goes, with friends like these, who needs enemies - that was the real theme from last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think the pundits were too busy talking to listen to the speech
itself. I noticed the same thing happening here, too. That trick never works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. It's a ratings thing
Right now people are angry about this leak. Rightfully so I might add. Anger, being an emotion, isn't always going to be rationally applied exactly where it belongs. People are angry at BP and angry at the government. Both entities are responsible for the leak, just in different ways. BP CEO Tony Hayward and President Obama are the two figure heads people are venting their anger at. Even though neither of them may have been personally responsible for the decisions which lead to this leak, they're both the faces people associate with this disaster.

The pundits are going to feed that anger as much as they can because an angry person wants someone to commiserate with them in their anger. Which amounts to more viewers and higher ratings for the pundits.

I never really get why people get so worked up over what the talking heads on these cable news-entertainment shows say. It just showbiz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You have it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. As a project manager, my first question and red flag:
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 10:45 AM by Myrina
" ... Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology ... "

If they don't have a concrete PLAN how to fix (a) blowout, expected or not, they should never have been allowed to start the drilling project in motion in the first place.

Project Management 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Absolutely. This well should never have been started.
I think everyone recognizes that, including President Obama. He had assurances that it was safe, and is not an engineer. So, the drilling went ahead. In reality, it was already in the pipeline, and it may be that President Obama never knew any of the details of where drilling would take place in the gulf. A new President in his first year has a lot of stuff going on.

This well was a huge mistake. I'm somewhat hopeful that the same mistake won't be made again, but we'll all have to wait and see on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:52 AM
Original message
And yet just a few weeks before the "spill" Obama championed more deep warter drilling.
That was a huge mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah, and I'll bet President Obama thinks it was a mistake, too.
The disaster happened. It's a wake-up call for a lot of people, I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
36. That is true. He can't say that though because then BP will say it was our fault
for letting them build without proving thus they don't owe a red cent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought is was a good speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, so did I. Maybe people are so upset and angry about this
disaster in the Gulf that they're not hearing clearly, or want an instant solution that no President can provide. I didn't see any wishy-washy stuff in that speech. I saw a resolve to fix this and to prevent future such disasters. I can't think of anything else he could have said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Instant magical solution
that is what people want.

They don't want to hear that the gusher will continue to at least August (and I am not hopeful that the first try will do it)

Now I will differ on the prayer issue. The country in theory has a separation of church and state. It was supposed to be that way by founding fathers who had in their historical memories the pain of a few religious wars, like the English Civil War and the Hundred Years War. They knew religion had a place in society, and that was in the PRIVATE SPHERE. So yes, I have a problem with Presidents praying in public. If they chose to do this in private, fine by me.

Perhaps this is because I KNOW what solid separation of church and state means... and in my mind this country needs that. I don't expect it to happen, as we are the MOST RELIGIOUS ADVANCED ECONOMY, and that will lead to some particularly nasty problems. And no, this is not a criticism of Obama, but American leaders really starting with the Cold War. It was a way to differentiate ourselves from the soulless Communists, but it should, not that it will, stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. The religion thing is a minor issue with regard to this speech.
Some people will appreciate it. They vote, too. I don't care if the President invokes religion. Every President does it, and we're still here.

The speech was about the disaster in the Gulf, not about religion. I prefer to focus on the actual problem of the day, rather than my desire to see better separation of church and state. As a strong atheist, I'd like to see a complete separation. But, if a President prays, I'm not going to discard him for that. It's a minor issue to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. My pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. "Now, there are costs associated with this transition" LOL
How much would we SAVE by not needing the most expensive military in the world to uh...appropriate oil?

There's your alternative energy 'transition' costs right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. We'd save a great deal. That's a different speech, and
President Obama was talking about the BP-caused disaster.

How would you suggest that we dismantle that military in the near future? I mean, I'd like to see that happen, too, but I don't see the mechanism for it.

If you do, I'd love to hear about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. The new guy Obama appointed head the MMS helped prosecute Olie North and Iran Contra
According to a White House biography, Bromwich is a partner at law firm Fried Frank with expertise in organizational oversight. He served from 2002-2008 as the independent monitor for the District of Columbia's police department, ensuring compliance with civil rights and other laws.

Bromwich was the Justice Department's inspector general from 1994-1999 and before that was a federal prosecutor. Among other cases he was a courtroom lawyer in the trial of former White House aide Oliver North in the Iran-Contra scandal of illegal U.S. funding for Nicaraguan rebels.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8568727
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. That's good information. Thanks!
Sounds like someone who gives a shit. We need that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. Here's one point I have a problem with.
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 12:11 PM by Ganja Ninja
"I’ve authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, they’re ready to help clean the beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims -- and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible."

The National Guard should not be a source of free labor for cleaning up BP's mess. We have plenty of unemployed people that can be used for this and paid by BP.

It seems like every time we have a problem we turn to the military. They can organize the response but they shouldn't be used in place of civilian employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. And yet, they're an organized force, and immediately available.
In fact, this is how the NG is used in all sorts of disasters. And so it has been for a long time. It's a valuable job that they often fill.

You'll note that training response workers is part of what they'll be doing. But President Obama can't order them into action. Only governors can do that. We'll see if they do it. Barbour, for one, may not. He's a moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. Thanks, Mineral Man
I really appreciate how you post thoughtful, well-reasoned analyses on Obama's speeches and other topics here at DU. Keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Thanks. I get a lot of flack, so it's really nice to hear.
I'll keep plugging on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. that's good dissemination of the speech k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. It's what he didn't say
It's not that he said anything "wrong" per se, it is he didn't say much of what people were hoping to hear. He talked strong, and was short on specifics.

He's deployed alot of equipment and people, but beaches are empty of workers and covered in oil.

He wants to get us to reduce our dependency on oil, but he doesn't have a clue how, despite 30 years of work on the subject.

He wants to clean up MMS, but his first attempt didn't work, and there's no specifics on the second one.

He's going to make BP pay, but 5 weeks into this and people are seeing huge delays in getting any checks.

He's going to clean up the mess, but decades after other spills and the mess still isn't cleaned up.

Like I say, it's not what he said, it's what was NOT said. Most of what he said, we already knew. It's the solutions that we are curious about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. Thanks for posting what he said. You are counteracting people who are
posting shit they made up about what he said.

I'm no Obama fangirl but I refuse to put up with people lying about what the man said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC