Oil Spill Response: Senator Introduces Bill Demanding Preemptive Relief Well Drilling

[Scurrilous]

<snip>

"A leading opponent of offshore drilling is making a bold legislative gambit in hopes of preventing any future catastrophic spills.

Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation on Tuesday that would require oil companies to begin drilling emergency relief wells concurrently with any new offshore drilling sites off the coast of the United States. The idea is to preemptively ensure that the most surefire safety mechanism is in place should major eruptions or spills occur. It would not apply to sites currently operating in the Gulf.

Officials in charge of stemming BP's spill have said that oil will likely only stop flowing once a relief well is completed in August. Had one been in place earlier, Lautenberg argues, the current ecological crisis could have been avoided.

"My bill takes a common-sense step to contain damages that come with the inherently dangerous drilling business. If relief wells had been in place before the BP rig explosion, the gushing oil could have been stopped in weeks instead of months," Lautenberg said in a statement sent to the Huffington Post. "Clean energy that will reduce our dependence on oil is the long-term solution - but while offshore drilling continues in the Gulf and Alaska, this bill provides a proven way to contain oil spill drilling disasters. I will also continue to oppose any energy proposal in the Senate that does not protect New Jersey from oil drilling in the Atlantic."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/15/oil-spill-response-senato_n_612666.html

[polichick]

1. Like they do in Canada, a civilized country - good on Lautenberg! nt

[NNN0LHI]

2. This is common-sense

About as common-sense as it gets. Anything less is foolhardy in light of recent developments.

Don

[stray cat]

3. I think its mandatory in Britain already