Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Reason Progressives Have So Little Patience Left When It Comes To Change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:49 PM
Original message
One Reason Progressives Have So Little Patience Left When It Comes To Change
It isn't two years we've been waiting for palpable change, it's ten (and longer). Before Obama we had to endure the agony of Bush. Eight agonizing years that produced all the damage and misery we predicted it would. So it's no wonder that after ten years we feel like our last nerve has been stepped on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The right never has to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's right.
They make sweeping changes right away. They always get what they want and they always do it fast. They ignore what the media or anyone else says and just do whatever they want, whenever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. They have core beliefs and manufacture consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. That is such a crap argument
If the right got everything they wanted, we'd have privatized social security, constitutionally banned abortion and permanent tax cuts for the rich instead of relying on reconciliation. Even under stupid W, the minority has enough power to prevent the majority from getting everything they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveVictory Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. couldnt agree more!
We have waited a looooong time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans win elections because they convince more people they have their interests in common
If you want change you have to convince your neighbors that the change is in their best interests - not that you will destroy everything they believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Republicans win through fear and hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Win Is Debatable
But this thread isn't about winning elections as last I looked we did win. It's about running out of patience for the change we voted for to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good point.
Under "normal" circumstances, patience is a good thing. But these are not normal circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I thought the Republicans lost the last two elections?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IOKIYAL Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ten years? Is that All?
That's like 5 minutes in activist time. How many oppressed groups have we read about that had to wait and suffer for decades or centuries before they even got started? Notice the word started. Since bush never promised (to my knowledge) progressives anything and didn't owe you guys anything, I would say that your time started when Obama took office. Change is slow and difficult and if ten years or two years is too long of a wait, then I don't think progressives are ready for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ten years?
I was thinking more along the lines of 30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. You're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here's another reason
Before Obama, none of us could conceive or imagine that a black man would ever be elected to the office of POTUS.
And so, understandably, after working so hard to elect him, we imagined that this impossible dream would be the signal of an equally massive break with the past -that we were going to be effecting real change.
To me anyway, it has left an incredibly bad taste in my mouth to see that it wasn't the case.

What kills me, and others I suspect, is the deep, inner-felt notion that if this didn't do the trick, then nothing will. It is the deep suspicion that real change will not happen in our lifetimes.

With Bush, we had been able to believe that it was all his fault. He was our enemy and we thought that without him, much would be solved.

To me, this is why we are so heartbroken and disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep, he didn't run as a corporatist - not based on what he said to the regular people, anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. You should have realized he would be Jackie Robinson
He can't be full of bluster and aggression without dooming the chances of any other minority candidate that runs after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. "Bluster and aggression" is a style issue - I have no problem with his style.
It's the substance I often object to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. When Dems got the Congress in 06, they were going ot end the war in Iraq.
How's that working out for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Expectations were so high...
Fair or not, expectations were very high, so the disappointment is even greater. Hard to be patient especially when realizing that Obama will likely be more politically bound as time goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think it's because "progressives" spend so much time trying to persuade the other side of their
rightness instead of just fucking DOING it. It infuriates me that we spend so much time trying to show people how our actions will make their lives better, instead of just doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC