Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What in the devil is Carville talking about??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:03 PM
Original message
What in the devil is Carville talking about??
He says in an article on CNN home page that the federal government has abused Louisiana long enough and it is time they helped. So he is blaming Obama and the Democrats for the slow response of BP. I think he should be kicked out of the Democratic Party he has been around that witch of a wife of his too damn long. Check it out...www.cnn.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. "witch of a wife" Is that ever true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Mary defames the word "witch".
I'd prefer "shrike".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Quite true!!! In fact, VERY true!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That insults shrikes.
They are lovely birds. "Harpy" is more apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Hey! What do you have against harpies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Shrike....
BWAHAHAHAHAH HHAH AHHA

Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's still pissed he wasn't the heir to power he thought he would be.
He sold out Kerry & the Democratic Party in '04, thinking Hillary Clinton was the anointed (and this he would be also):

Did Carville Tip Bush Off to Kerry Strategy (Woodward)


By M.J. Rosenberg | bio




On page 344, Woodward describes the doings at the White House in the early morning hours of Wednesday, the day after the '04 election.

Apparently, Kerry had decided not to concede. There were 250,000 outstanding ballots in Ohio.

So Kerry decides to fight. In fact, he considers going to Ohio to camp out with his voters until there is a recount. This is the last thing the White House needs, especially after Florida 2000.

-snip

"Carville told her he had some inside news. The Kerry campaign was going to challenge the provisional ballots in Ohio -- perhaps up to 250,000 of them. 'I don't agree with it, Carville said. I'm just telling you that's what they're talking about.'

-snip

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. LA (many of the public and the politicians) are heavily
intertwined with big oil. They blame the govt. but have loved the oil "jobs" they have gotten for years. The abusive relationship is with big oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok, to be fair
Yes, the Obama response has been bad, though not horrible. To compare this to Katrina is a joke, as the GOP actively used that to gain power. However, Carville, many of the people responsible are the same damn BLUE DOGS that you supported throughout the years. If I hear you slam Jindal and Landreiu as hard, I might believe you, but to blame Obama for BP is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick him in the nuts...his brain has been washed by mary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You know, I've been pretty good about not saying anything to get me in trouble here,
but the urge to give a succinct, humorous and scatological reply to your comment is almost overwhelming.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Splurge the URGE....Lessen the pressure LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick him out? Obama has endorsed and campaigned for "worse" Democrats
Come on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Cut the crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. True. Blanche and Arlene are the epitome of liberals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Oh, peanut gallery
go jump in the lake :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Quite the refutation
Oh, now I see the errors of my way. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Took you down like a pro
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Correction
You put the quotation marks around the wrong word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. maybe you better read this and know what we on the Gulf know..
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 11:38 PM by undergroundrailroad

Read more: http://www.adn.com/2010/06/09/1315823/bp-c-plan.html

"Lutz is listed as a go-to wildlife specialist at the University of Miami. But Lutz, an eminent sea turtle expert, left Miami almost 20 years ago to chair the marine biology department at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton. He died four years before the plan was published.".


BP's Gulf spill plan outdated, error-filled

By JUSTIN PRITCHARD, TAMARA LUSH and HOLBROOK MOHR
The Associated Press

Published: June 9th, 2010 10:32 PM
Last Modified: June 12th, 2010 11:38 AM

VENICE, La. - Professor Peter Lutz is listed in BP's 2009 response plan for a Gulf of Mexico oil spill as a national wildlife expert.
He died in 2005..





Under the heading "sensitive biological resources," the plan lists marine mammals including walruses, sea otters, sea lions and seals. None lives anywhere near the Gulf.

The names and phone numbers of several Texas A&M University marine life specialists are wrong. So are the numbers for marine mammal stranding network offices in Louisiana and Florida, which are no longer in service.

BP PLC's 582-page regional spill plan for the Gulf, and its 52-page, site-specific plan for the Deepwater Horizon rig are riddled with omissions and glaring errors, according to an Associated Press analysis that details how BP officials have been making it up as they go along. The lengthy plans approved by the federal government last year before BP drilled its ill-fated well vastly understate the dangers posed by an uncontrolled leak and vastly overstate the company's preparedness to deal with one.

"Look, it's obvious to everybody in south Louisiana that they didn't have a plan, they didn't have an adequate plan to deal with this spill," said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. "They didn't anticipate the (blowout preventer) failure. They didn't anticipate this much oil hitting our coast. From the very first days, they kept telling us, ‘Don't worry, the oil's not going to make it to your coast.' "

In the spill scenarios detailed in the BP's exploration plan, fish, marine mammals and birds escape serious harm; beaches remain pristine; water quality is only a temporary problem. And those are the projections for a leak about 10 times worse than what has been calculated for the ongoing disaster.

There are other wildly false assumptions in the documents. BP's proposed method to calculate spill volume judging by the darkness of the oil sheen is way off. The internationally accepted formula would produce estimates 100 times higher.

The Gulf's loop current, which is projected to help eventually send oil hundreds of miles around Florida's southern tip and up the Atlantic coast, isn't mentioned in either plan.


The website listed for Marine Spill Response Corp. - one of two firms that BP relies on for equipment to clean a spill - links to a defunct Japanese-language page.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Can you point me to the articles in the Louisiana press
complaining about the lack of oversight on the oil rigs that were published before this disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. flyarm, please limit re-posting of copyrighted articles to 4 paragraphs.
You have some editing time, please edit to the copyright standard. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. ok sorry!! but too late to edit..thanks..eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. here's the article
he mentions Obama once and doesn't mention the Democratic party at all, and actually focusses on the neglect that Louisiana has been suffering for decades. Far from blaming everything on Obama.

I'm no fan of Carville, but this article is pretty good. (and again, it's NOT about Obama, so don't be afraid to read it).

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/06/13/carville.louisiana.justice/index.html?iref=allsearch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Here's where Carville loses credibility
Add that to the fact that we have not seen a single penny of royalties for oil produced more than six miles off our coast. We assume all of the risk, produce seafood and oil and gas, with none of the reward. Royalties totaling $165 billion have gone to the federal treasury when they could go to help repair this pressing issue.

Then the oil companies dredged canals in the marshlands in an attempt to grow an industry which now provides the country with more than 30 percent of its domestic oil and natural gas. Saltwater intrusion is killing the marsh. These marshlands provide jobs for tens of thousands of fisherman in an industry that provides over 30 percent of this country's domestic seafood supply.

<...>

This is a struggle for the preservation of our culture, way of life, and the land we love.


He's more interested in the royalities as he continues to call for an end to the moratorium.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. How does that make him lose credibility?
What he is saying is that other oil drilling states get 50% of revenues. La. gets 10%. Is it any wonder then that we cannot do this ourselves?
What he is arguing for is to give us what every other oil state has, so that since the federal government can't/won't do what needs to be done now, give us what we deserve, in fairness, and allow us to combat this ourselves.

If asking/demanding something that every other oil producing state has makes him lose 'credibility', so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Calling for an end to the moratorium?
Credibility lost.

Also, Louisiana doesn't own federal waters.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wait a minute, you cannot argue what you inititially said, so you switch?
You said he lost credibility over arguing for Louisiana's royalties. I asked how that made him lose credibility, and now you bring up another issue entirely?
Okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. "He's more interested in the royalities as he continues to call for an end to the moratorium. "
That's from my previous comment. See, the moratorium isn't "another issue entirely."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
36.  The problem with manipulating article intent seems to be chronic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Another reason the whole revenue argument is bogus
In addition to not owning the federal waters and as those calling for an end to the moratorium keep emphasizing, drilling contributes significantly to the state's economy. In other words, Louisiana is benefitting significantly from the very thing that Carville supports while claiming that it is destroying their way of life.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Very well then,
Deny Louisiana their fair share of oil revenues, and just let us depend on the kindness of the government to handle this.
Its working out great so far. Sure, just give La. their measly 10%, and let the other states get 50%, and call any complains about it illegitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. And when we ask to be able to tax like the other states we are told we are
trying to steal from the US Treasury.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
39.  It is a good article. Sad that because they don't like Carville some will misinterpret and trash it...
I wasn't a huge Carville fan. I actually personally got into him with it about Hillary and the primary. He actually signed a book to me "to blank, with whom I disagree but who is a great Democrat and who I would want at my back in a fight!" Unlike some,James can agree to disagree.

James has raised money for Obama and campaigned for him. He has done more for Obama than his detractors. He still does. Louisiana is his home and he has the right to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Carville speaks for us, and so does Garland...
Right there with you. I voted for and supported Obama.
Carville is saying what many here feel. That Since the government can't be bothered, let us handle it, and give us only what every other oil producing state has.


Here is a video link to a local talk show host. He addresses this issue very passionately, and goes through the details and macro situation-
Garland Robinette: 14 Scary Truths about BP Oil Leak
WWLFirstNews — May 21, 2010 — WWL's Garland Robinette outlines 14 scary truths about the BP Gulf Oil leak and issued a stern warning to Americans that their security is at risk as oil washes into fragile ecosystems all over South Louisiana and the leak develops into a full blown ecological calamity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXIo8fGkNJo&feature=player_embedded


I only ask that everyone who is complaining about Carville watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Someone ought to tell James that this isn't just Louisiana's
problem; the Gulf and its marshes belong to all of us, just like the Redwoods and Grand Canyon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I am in Florida
Damn straight it is not just Louisiana's problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Hmmm.... if (when) the oil washes up on Florida's beaches,
does that mean Florida gets some of the royalties from off-shore drilling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. And take that witch of a wife with you!
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think he's sleeping with the republicans!
....in more ways then one ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. Carville is a Hillary supporter who never got over her loss
Many who supported Hillary are hoping Obama gets so damaged that Hillary can run in 2012. But what they don't realize is that if the President goes down, the whole party will go with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Yawn. Same old canard. Primary, Blah blah Blah. Give it a rest
We are allowed to vote for any of several candidates in primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. When did I say anyone was not
allowed to vote for any of several candidates in primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. You didn't but you did say Carville was a"Hillary supporter who never got over her loss" and
said that there were Hillary supporters that want to "damage" Obama. This is just Primary BS and is meant to create bad feeling. If you don't like what Carville states, fine, but it has nothing to do with his primary support or that of the Clinton supporters.

It is really time to move on and it doesn't matter who supported whom. We can judge comment on its own merit. It doesn't matter to me at all who someone supported, or who they are married to.They have the right to speak and be judged on the merit of the content alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. He sold his Pepto-Palace in the DC area, and is now ensconced in LA again
so for him, it's personal, but he's barking up the wrong tree.. All that "pal-ling around" with those "republican friends" of his during the Clinton admin & the Bush admin has born fruit..oily fruit, right in his own backyard..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC