Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC's strange re-broadcasting schedule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:27 PM
Original message
MSNBC's strange re-broadcasting schedule
WHY is Tweety's show shown *3* times in an evening? Ed Schultz's show is repeated at *3 AM* in my area, and Dylan Ratigan is NOT repeated at all?

I'm very grateful that Rachel is re-broadcast, and KO -- but do we need the shrill brown-nosing of Tweety *3* times during the day? Why can't Ed and Dylan get two of those slots, and re-broadcast Tweety in the 3 am slot?

Dylan and Ed have been doing far more investigative stuff that Tweety. I personally think their ratings would go up if they cut back on the shrill one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like it's time for an email to MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. What they should do, really.
Is just start the afternoon/evening (depending on your timezone) block at 3:00 Pacific/6:00 Eastern. Tweety and Ed could argue over who goes first, but I say leave it as it is now. Ed, followed by Tweety, then Keith, then Rachel. And then repeat the whole block again at 7:00/10:00. Do away with the 2:00/5:00 airing of Hardball completely. Replace it with the Dylan Ratigan rerun, or a news block, or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sounds good to me
Hardball is a waste of airtime. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's about ratings, Hardball has been more succesful
with increasing overall viewers and the target demo. While Olberman lost total viewers by -6% his demo ratings sank like a stone in both time slots(-24%, -11%), Maddow increased her total viewers by 7% but her demo was(-3%, +3%)so breaking even.

From May 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why they even play Tweety or Morningbagger is beyond me
Tweety about half the time makes little sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC