Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOLA: "Jindal says Obama still doesn't get moratorium's economic impact"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:01 PM
Original message
NOLA: "Jindal says Obama still doesn't get moratorium's economic impact"
The leak has not been stopped. There is no evidence that anyone has the technology to stop the leak. The moratorium does not even stop pumping from existing wells. Yet, Jindal is demanding that the moratorium end in the wake of the BP oil disaster?

http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/jindal_says_obama_still_doesnt.html


With three shuttered oil rigs preparing to leave the Gulf of Mexico for foreign waters, Gov. Bobby Jindal ratcheted up the rhetoric Thursday against the Obama administration's moratorium on deepwater drilling, saying the White House still doesn't understand the economic pain the forced stoppage is causing Louisiana workers.

Jindal said he had a conference call with President Barack Obama's senior adviser, Valerie Jarrett, and appealed to her to shorten the six-month moratorium, arguing that a half-year pause would force oil companies to move drilling operations overseas for years and that the federal government could easily impose new safety standards and monitoring in a shorter time frame.

* * *

Jindal, who addressed hundreds of angry shipyard workers at a slip in Port Fourchon, said Obama needs to listen to the majority of a panel of experts, who advised the Interior Department on drilling safety and recently said they were not in favor of a six-month "blanket moratorium."

Obama's response has been to say that safety and preventing another spill must come first. The administration said it's aware of the moratorium's impact on the local economy and will press BP to pay for wages lost due to the moratorium, but Jindal said, "Our people don't want a claims check or an unemployment check; they want to get back to work."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shameless fucktard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. What I'd do:
1. Moratorium continues
2. The "lost" oil is considered abandoned property, belonging to nobody while on/in the water.
3. Tell the oil companies "Finders, Keepers" and that would spark activity to collect the oil and give compensation for lost revenue.

The down side would be no motivation to cap the gaping hole in the bottom of the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny how oil jobs matter more than fishing, restaurant and tourist jobs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Understand that big offshore oil is the big local employer
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 12:12 PM by marylanddem
But Jindal & the outraged oil workers need to realize that this bullshit is untenable & bad for the planet
I hope to hell Obama stands his ground on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jindal doesn't get that we know he's a dishonest sociopath
a nutter in need of a straight-jacket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's the problem with so many RW guvs with further political ambitions.
Substitute "Jan Brewer" and it rings just as accurately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Psst, President O., jot down JINDAL & BARBOUR as asses to kick!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Bobby, that's what happens when you put all your state's economic eggs
in one basket. Stooopid is as stooopid does. I have little sympathy for some of these states right now who have a history of going for easy money while holding their citizens back from their potential. These people pursued petrochemical revenues and played bullyboy tactics to get them. In all of the resources available to them, this is what they chose. Consequenced be damned. Well consequences mean something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jindal Doesn't Get All the Disaster's Impact
I don't think Governor Jindal gets the economic, ecological and human impact of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Perhaps we should get that under control and address the causes before risking another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. So, ... the 'smaller govt' guy wants a big govt response?
Jindal should go back to his area of expertise, ... volcanoes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. They probaly could conduct an extensive investigation more
quickly (although not sure if the government knows how to do anything 'quickly'). They should try to compromise. Who knows -- even after the investigation they may decide it's too risky -- what then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. hey bobby, you don't get the gushers economic impact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC