Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Boies: Prop 8 Trial Establishes as “Matter of Fact” that Marriage Equality Doesn’t...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:40 AM
Original message
David Boies: Prop 8 Trial Establishes as “Matter of Fact” that Marriage Equality Doesn’t...
David Boies: Prop 8 Trial Establishes as “Matter of Fact” that Marriage Equality Doesn’t Hurt Straight Marriage
By: emptywheel Thursday June 10, 2010 12:08 pm

<snip>

The lawyers for the plaintiffs in Perry v. Schwarzenegger trial had a conference call to preview what they will say in next week’s closing arguments (which Teddy, bmaz, and I will cover from the courthouse).

The most interesting response from the legal team came in response to questions about the defendants’ complaints about having a trial and their efforts to withdraw almost all of their “expert” witness testimony.

In response to that question, David Boies engaged in a bit of trash-talk, noting how much of their witnesses’ testimony either contradicted itself or ended up endorsing key claims made by the plaintiffs.

Boycotting a trial almost never a winning strategy. They identified 8 experts. What happened is that their experts broke down, either at deposition or at trial. They tried to come up with the evidence, they knew they were required to come up with evidence. They tried to build that trial record and they simply failed. They didn’t fail because they’re bad lawyers, they failed because there isn’t any evidence to support the argument they’re advocating.


Ted Olson answered the question, first of all, noting that the defendants’ witnesses couldn’t hold up under Boies’ cross-examination. But he also emphasized the audacity of spending tens of millions of dollars to convince Californians to deprive a class of people of a fundamental right, but then saying they didn’t want to defend the same arguments in an independent court of law.

With respect to their complaints about the trial, I find it ironic that people that spent $40 million dollars to pass Prop 8 suddenly didn’t want to defend it when David Boies was going to challenge their witnesses. … Trials are pursuits of justice. That is how we resolve things in this country, particularly when there’s a constitutional matter. So for the proponents of Prop 8 who convinced millions of Californians, to take away rights of portion of Californians. To say, “We don’t want to defend what we did in trial of independent American judiciary” is audacious, is the best thing I can say about it.


But the discussion was perhaps presented most simply when Boies explained the value of getting the defendants’ witnesses to agree with key aspects of the plaintiffs’ arguments over the course of the trial. Boies noted that the trial record demonstrates as “a matter of fact” that there is no harm to heterosexual marriage from permitting gay men and lesbians to marry.


<snip>

Link: http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/06/10/david-boies-prop8-trial-establishes-as-matter-of-fact-that-marriage-equality-doesnt-hurt-straight-marriage/

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. prop 8 = imposition of mormon religion on everybody in california nt
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 09:48 AM by msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. While the Mormons may have sponsored the innovative it was the voters of California
that "imposed" it upon California..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You mean bigots
don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. My guess is that there will be a lot of angry "preachers" in CA
if this gets overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What's silly is that those "angry preachers" can fill their coffers faster if Marriage Equality-
was the law, if Prop 8 had failed.
Like abortion and other social "rights" it would become a dog-whistle for the conservatives and political gold during election times - so long as they never actually overturn it.
Yes, there would all sorts of screaming and nasty imagery about "the gay" and what it's doing to society, but there's so much profit to be made off an ignorant, frightened congregation - and much more over a longer period of time if they're frightened about something legal than fighting to keep it illegal.
Of course, that might be the plan, but think of how much money they're wasting spending on ensuring election outcomes and being forced to actually mount a legal defense rather than raking in the dough while they make a half-assed attempt to look like they're actually doing something with the money.

Yes, there's a few true believers, but my observation was that most of the religious leadership for Prop 8 are ultimately greedy power-mongers.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. The ONLY answer which matters
is that gay rights=civil rights.

The. End.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Precisely.
If one class of people is denied equality, all are denied security. No wonder so many Americans are afraid of an overbearing government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC