Balls and Strikes and the Roberts Court (We're called out . "Juuuuuuuuuuust a bit outside ")

[Are_grits_groceries]

During his confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court in 2005, John Roberts assured senators that his job as a judge was merely "to call balls and strikes." It was a familiar, homey allusion, deliberately designed to suggest that ideology didn't — or anyway, shouldn't — play a role in deciding cases. He would be interpreting the plain meaning of the law, not making up his own.

But as fond as conservatives are of this kind of imagery, it's mostly a myth. Recently the Constitutional Accountability Center took a look at Supreme Court rulings during the Roberts era, but instead of looking at hot button social issues they looked at the kinds of rulings that, although they get less attention, actually take up the bulk of the court's time: those involving business and corporate law. The results were pretty startling.

A good guidepost to these rulings is the position taken by the United States Chamber of Commerce, which bills itself as the "voice of business." Roberts's record? In the past five years he's sided with the Chamber 70% of the time. In close cases he's sided with the Chamber a stunning 90% of the time. As an umpire, it turns out that if you're filing a case against the business community Roberts has declared a strike zone only a few inches wide.

And Roberts isn't alone. Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia also sided with the Chamber over 70% of the time. (Alito sided with the Chamber a stunning 100% of the time in close cases.) Clarence Thomas took their side 68% of the time. And "centrist" Anthony Kennedy? He clocked in around 66%.


The kinds of regulatory issues involved in these cases are, in the long run, more important than all but the most explosive culture war cases. They include things like Citizens United, which allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums in political campaigns; Ledbetter v. Goodyear, which effectively eliminated the right to sue for race or gender pay discrimination; and Exxon v. Baker, which slashed the damage award in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case by 80%.

And those are only the big ones. You can add in hundreds of other, smaller cases that have slowly but steadily chipped away at the right to hold corporations accountable over the past three decades.
<snip>
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/06/balls-and-strikes-and-roberts-court

We weren't really given an at bat, much less a real place on the team.

Props to Bob Uecker and the movie 'Major League' for the quote:
:35 clip - http://www.movietome.com/pages/media_player/index.php?video_id=ZPmcgaZo6E643wS5rAw LOL!

[madokie]

1. Roberts Alito, Scalia and Thomas all should be impeached

They are not impartial jurist and only a fool would see them as.
rec

[fasttense]

2. The Dancing Supremes destroyed Democracy, justice and the Constitution

when they picked our President for us. It was a blatant fascist coupe. But everyone pretended otherwise.

We are still pretending. I guess it's what Americans do best. To bad we're not very good at fighting tyranny or protesting. We'll just have to wait until....

[pinboy3niner]

3. K&R

Great post, Grits!:thumbsup:

:kick: