Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This can't be good

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:21 PM
Original message
This can't be good
Surprise SC Senate candidate has charge pending

<snip>
COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina's surprise Democratic nominee to challenge U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint is facing a pending felony charge.

Court records show 32-year-old Alvin Greene was arrested in November and charged with showing obscene Internet photos to a University of South Carolina student. The felony charge carries up to five years in prison.
<snip>
The unemployed veteran posted bond after his arrest. He has yet to enter a plea or be indicted.

Records indicate Greene showed photos to a woman and talked about going to her room at a university dorm.
<snip>

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hNyH1XTKf1Adc_-fGBAefXf8YYEQD9G7T67G0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh boy. SC Democrats really picked a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. If this were true, why would he put his name in the hat
and run? Didn't he learn anything from the Edward's debacle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Um have you seen this guy's quotes?
He's not quite there. This is a failure of the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's illegal to show porn to another adult?
Since when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A felony, no less. I'm in trouble, I guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe she or the people in the photos
were under 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. "Maybe" is a looooong way from guilty. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I didn't insinuate that he was guilty
I stated a possible reason for an arrest. I'm a firm believer in presumed innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. The charge indicates otherwise
Disseminating, Procurring or Promoting Obsenity

If he had shown a dirty picture to a minor it would have been an entirely different charge.

I don't know the particulars of the case but I imagine we'll soon find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes, I read
post #17 too. The article I linked to was vague on the charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Err, I think if it's unsolicitied...
it can be a form of harassment. Like flashing. Depending on the circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Ahh, the slippery slope of obscenity law
You see, there's the rub. A person can be charged and then it's up to a jury of peers to determine whether or not, according to community standards, if the material is, indeed, obscene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. It's certainly creepy as hell
if unsolicited. Also probably not a very successful strategy to meet women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is a complete set-up
I wonder if anyone will investigate and figure out how Republicans managed to pull this off. They're going to need SC to go back Republican if they have any hope at 2012. Rat fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. What do you mean go back?
South Carolina already is Republican. There is no real chance a Democrat is going to beat Jim DeMint. While this reflects poorly on the S.C. Democratic Party, it doesn't amount to very much considering no Democrat was going to win this seat anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Or it could be trumped up ratfucking. That's where I'm putting my money. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. He sounds like he would fit in with the republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Lieberman could do it, why can't Vic Rawl?
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 01:48 PM by kma3346
Run as an independent, that is. It sounds like he would have a good chance of winning.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/campaign/101017-sen-demint-less-than-a-shoo-in-for-reelection

Sen. DeMint less than a shoo-in for reelection

By Jack Bass - 06/02/10 11:14 AM ET

Despite South Carolina’s national image as along the reddest of the red states, Senator Jim DeMint is less than a shoo-in for reelection. Three recent polls show him approval rating in the 48-52 range, barely ahead of President Obama in the state, with voters indicating significant concern about DeMint’s seemingly greater interest in stimulating a national ultra-conservative movement than in South Carolina issues and interests.

Republican-leaning independents hold the key, and DeMint is facing an as-yet little known Democratic challenger, but one with strong credentials. Many South Carolinians are embarrassed by the state’s national image that flows from Republican hi-jinks. They range from Gov. Mark Sanford’s Argentine “soul mate” on the Appalachian Trail to Rep. Joe Wilson’s “You lie”—and those are only the highlights. This disenchantment, especially among independent voters, is combined with the highest state unemployment rate in the southeast.

After wealthy Rock Hill attorney and political novice Chad McGowan failed to gain traction after filing for the Democratic nomination last October and dropped out in February, a more experienced challenger, still little known, is beginning to dig in. Vic Rawl, six years older than DeMint at 64, served eight years in the legislature and another twelve as a state circuit court judge before stepping down to a law practice that focuses on mediation and arbitration. He is heading to Washington Thursday in response to an invitation from the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee.

One element in Rawl’s favor will be reminding especially older voters of the 38 years when South Carolina was simultaneously represented in the Senate by Republican Strom Thurmond and Democrat Fritz Hollings. No matter who was in the White House, South Carolina’s interests were taken care of...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Was DeMint in any danger of losing anyway?
Nice how we get to find out AFTER the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here is the case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC