Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Empire under Obama: UN Human Rights Expert Says US Claims Right to Kill with Impunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:14 AM
Original message
The Empire under Obama: UN Human Rights Expert Says US Claims Right to Kill with Impunity
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/06/02-8

Published on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 by Agence France Presse
UN Expert: CIA Drones Claim 'License to Kill' with Impunity

GENEVA — A UN human rights expert on Wednesday urged the United States to sideline the CIA from targeted killings using drones, warning that the practice amounted to "a license to kill without accountability".

UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Philip Alston. In a new report, Alston has warned that the "prolific" US use of targeted killings, mainly by unmanned aircraft, was setting a damaging example that other countries would follow. (AFP)In a report to the UN Human Rights Council, Philip Alston, the special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, warned that the "prolific" US use of targeted killings, mainly by unmanned aircraft, was setting a damaging example that other countries would follow.

"I?m particularly concerned that the United States seems oblivious to this fact when it asserts an ever-expanding entitlement for itself to target individuals across the globe," he told the 47-member council.

"But this strongly asserted but ill-defined license to kill without accountability is not an entitlement which the United States or other states can have without doing grave damage to the rules designed to protect the right to life and prevent extrajudicial executions."

Alston's study on targeted killings sharply criticized the legal arguments invoked to justify them, their civilian toll and the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. "it's a big evil ship, it takes a while to change course!
More of that 'Change you have to believe in to see' :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
To make up for my thread killing reply... :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. "the United States seems oblivious" sums it up.
:kick: & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is Ivory Tower talk. If we have to "protect the right to life," how do we win the Forever War &
save the People of the World from the scourge of terrorism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Minor Point:: Title and position do not an expert make
Brownie and FEMA come to mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Philip Alston
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. And a soldier running over a hill shooting at anything that moves is
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 10:33 PM by johnaries
not "killing without accountability"?

"Targeted assaults" are intended to cut down on "collateral damage", which actually means "innocent civilians". Perhaps they would prefer more innocent civilians be killed?

I understand the ban on "assasination", since that's what started WW1. But this is apples and oranges. One increases human death and misery. The other limits it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC