Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paper industry tests genetically altered trees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:25 PM
Original message
Paper industry tests genetically altered trees
TAMPA, Fla. – The commercial paper industry's plans to plant forests of genetically altered eucalyptus trees in seven Southern states have generated more cries from critics worried that such a large introduction of a bioengineered nonnative plant could throw natural ecosystems out of whack.

ArborGen, a biotechnology venture affiliated with three large paper companies, got U.S. Department of Agriculture approval last month for field trials involving as many as 250,000 trees planted at 29 sites during the next few years. Much smaller lots of the genetically altered trees have been growing in some of the states for years.

Australian eucalyptus trees grow faster than native hardwoods and produce high-quality pulp perfect for paper production, but thus far, they have been able to thrive only in very warm climates. South Carolina-based ArborGen genetically altered the trees to withstand freezing temperatures, and the idea with the test forests is to see how far north they can now be grown.

More: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100607/ap_on_bi_ge/us_food_and_farm_bioengineered_eucalyptus



Hemp now please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Chiming in to say "hemp" like you did.
No research necessary, just plant it and watch it grow, fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Beat me to it.
Why not legalize hemp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm guessing that the timer industry and other special interests are against it
meanwhile we import hemp products from Canada. Insane. Industrial hemp is no more hallucinogenic than shitake mushrooms are; yet shitake mushrooms, like other edible mushrooms, are legal while other types of "'shrooms" are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. They need to leave the Australian Eucalyptus trees
in Australia.

Imagine how much Kudzu they'll have to clear to get them planted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Really
There are already thousands of Maleleucca, Norfolk Pines, and Eucalyptus loose in the Southern Everglades..
The the Eucalyptus and Maleleucca were planted on purpose to dry out the glades..idiots, now Fl spends a bunch of$$ every year cutting them down. Maleleuccas also release toxins that really made me sick when they were in bloom or on fire.

This is really fucking insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if this will end badly
like all Frankenstein experiments, the unintended consequences are rife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC