Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Pelosi: Jeebus is coming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:53 AM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi: Jeebus is coming
is Nancy going Rapture Ready on us?


http://jonathanturley.org/2010/06/02/word-to-your-speaker-pelosi-proclaims-her-commitment-to-faith-based-politics/

At the Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, Pelosi added


“They ask me all the time, ‘What is your favorite this? What is your favorite that? What is your favorite that?’ And one time, ‘What is your favorite word?’ And I said, ‘My favorite word? That is really easy. My favorite word is the Word, is the Word. And that is everything. It says it all for us. And you know the biblical reference, you know the Gospel reference of the Word. And that Word is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word. The Word. Isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. The Word.

Fill it in with anything you want. But, of course, we know it means: ‘The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.’ And that’s the great mystery of our faith. He will come again. He will come again. So, we have to make sure we’re prepared to answer in this life, or otherwise, as to how we have measured up.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ms. Pelosi has a right to her faith
She was speaking at a gathering of religious types. I'm not really seeing the problem - that is unless the problem is some desire to force members of our party to become atheists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. She is a public figure and whether talking to a religious group or not
I am concerned when she references 'the Word' and that we must recognize it in terms of public policy. Whenever a politician refers to interjecting religious idealogy into public policy, I cringe. I don't think atheism has anything to do with this. Government and religion must remain separate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How was she injecting it into public policy?
Do you have a link for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I was referring to the post. In her own words.
"....And that Word is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I can translate that into the secular
Straighten up and fly right because judgment has a way of catching up to people.

The story goes that when Jesus returns, he will judge humankind.

It's a pretty common theme in a lot of religions - judgement day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Personally, she could have said the same in secular terms, I agree.
Religious 'themes' get us, and many others around the world, into wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Many times folks who are that caught up "in the word" will inject that
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 12:29 PM by Obamanaut
caught-up-ness into their jobs. They cannot help themselves. It's new testamental for them "Go ye therefore unto all the world, preaching the gospel to every living creature."

They just do it.

Did we not, right here on DU, poke fun at the former president for similar utterances? Is it now forbidden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I think that is incorrect
I'm a bit rusty but I'm pretty sure "the gospel" is about the promise of forgiveness from God by accepting that his son died for the sins of humankind. Jesus' return is more about judgment day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. Yes, 'gospel' is about the 'good news of redemption.' But why get
hung up here on the definition of one word, or the use of it, when the theme of my response was the acceptance of nutbaggery by one politician and the ridicule of the same nutbaggery by another.

I guess it is not true about 'sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. I do not condemn Bush for believing in a religion
I condemn him for his arrogance in believing he was the direct agent of God. I condemn him for applying his dispensationalist beliefs to his foreign policy. I condemn him for his willingness to bring the end of the world to fruition.

Ms. Pelosi's statement is nothing more than a variation on the fairly universal religious concept that one day, we will all face judgment. In Islam it is called Yawm al-Qiyāmah. Buddhists have a Judge of the Dead named Yama. I have no problem with this concept because taking assessment at the end of life is extremely human.

I understand and agree that our elected officials should keep their religion out of our government. Just the same, I also know that dismissing people, out of hand, for their religious views is an exercise in futility. I find if I try to find common ground with religious people, then my relationships with them are much more harmonious. I, an agnostic, am in a minority. I live in a world of others and most of them believe in some kind of deity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Yep.
But it's so much cooler when Pelosi or Obama does it. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Yet she believes in abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
55. Or more accurately, a woman's right to have an abortion
I don't know what her personal choice might have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
66. she supports a woman's right over her own body, you are repeating wingnut crap
but i guess that's what one should expect from them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. that is part of what is said at every Catholic mass
He will come again in fulfillment of the scriptures ...

and no, I don't think Speaker Pelosi has gone "rapture ready" on us.

:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I don't either
especially as that sort of theology ("the rapture") is far more common in the much newer, pentecostal or non-denominational strains of Christianity.

She's simply saying that her faith informs her positions - and that she feels a responsibility to do what is right, right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm gagging...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:03 PM
Original message
The Bird, the Bird, the Bird is the word oh the bird, bird, bird, bird is the word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's the only word I know!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Careful Callous, yer showing yer age!
I remember that song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. A video of her eyes darting around while that song plays would be fabulous!
I'm not suggesting someone should make a youtube video with Nancy's eyes darting nervously to BIRD BIRD BIRD ... Oh, who the hell am I kidding? Of course I'm suggesting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robdogbucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pap ooh, mau mau, Papa ooh mau mau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. oooo mmmaaa maaa mow ooo mmaaa mmaaa maaa mow.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robdogbucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. The bed, the bed, the bed is a wet.....
Trashmen's, "Surfin' Bird"

Misheard Lyrics:
I want everybody's head above the bed.

Original Lyrics:
Well everybody's heard about the bird.


Misheard Lyrics:
Well everybody said about the bed
The bed, bed, bed, the bed is a wet.
Original Lyrics:
Well everybody's heard about the bird
The bird, bird, bird, the bird is the word.


Misheard Lyrics:
Well, everybody said about the bird
The bird, bird, bird
The bird is a widow.

Original Lyrics:
Well, everybody said about the bird
The bird, bird, bird
The bird is the word.






Additional centavos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
56. Word up!
A little love for Cameo and that killer 80's hi-top fade.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, that's two words
if it's just "word", it would be more like:

ME: Yo, Nance, wanna go eat?

Nancy: Word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry Nancy, the Second Coming is off the table
God is mad because you didn't bring justice to the criminals who stole our government and are now trashing the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zix Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. What a bunch of cock.

It would possibly be okay if it actually meant anything, even anything religious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't see the problem here
Unless one is operating under a knee-jerk opposition to anyone speaking of their faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Everything has to
spark outrage. It's like a drug.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I thougt we had freedom of and from religion here in the United States.
Some forgot the "of". The from is important too but everyone has the right to believe what religion they want to, or none at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. Exactly.
I never understand why a person's personal expression of faith is so problematic. We might disagree with the person's opinion, but it's a shame to see someone talking about what inspires her to work for the good denigrated because it's put in religious terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I read a lot of opposition when the former president did it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. That was different
:sarcasm:

I forget how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. HAH!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Plenty of disagreement, yes
And those of us who are religious surely felt his understanding was harmful to the country and wrong on theology.

He used his religion as a cover for what was really self-centered and self-aggrandizing behavior. Toss in discriminatory and a whole lot of other ugly things.

Where did what Pelosi said do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. The difference is that one of them sits at the "cool kids'" table, and the
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 03:02 PM by Obamanaut
other did not.

"cool kids' table" is an old high school reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. No, I think the difference is that one is doing - or trying to do -
good work, and one had only selfish and evil intents.

Both are perfectly entitled to their own view of their faith. And both are perfectly entitled to speak of it.

The test of it all is really in what they do. To borrow another biblical phrase - we know them by their fruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. The problem is when whack job fundies bring it into the U.S. government
which is VIOLATION of the Constitution which calls for SEPARATION of church and state.

Far too many of these elected officials-who are EMPLOYEES of the american people-are pushing their beliefs instead of the law.

So yeah, I have a HUGE problem with public employees spewing their crap because they are NOT representing everyone they were elected to represent! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. So every word at every moment from a person employed by the
government should be devoid of any religious reference? Don't you think that rather impedes their right to free speech?

If the goal is to represent everyone, then are we to expect Nancy Pelosi to represent the views of the tea-partiers in her district?

What you seem to be saying is that you are against religion, and you want to be sure that anyone and everyone in government share you antipathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. People need to keep their beliefs to themselves when at work. Simple as that.
Freedom of speech stops where other peoples freedom of speech begins and no one should be subjected or intimidated by religion at the workplace.

FYI-I could give a shit what anyone's religion is-just DO NOT shove it in my face!

Which is EXACTLY what fundies do 24/7!

You do not see that kind of behavior from Jewish people, Buddists or Hindus, just fundies!

And one more thing, Religion is what has fucked up this world and that is a FACT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
59. That's not the way I see it.
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 05:18 PM by polmaven
I am a person of faith, and I really resented the way the Bushies constantly tried to force me to believe as they do....Particularly because I am still amazed at the apparent "convenience" of most of what they claim to believe, but she was speaking at a religious event, about her own faith, and not force it on anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
45. 'a knee-jerk opposition to anyone speaking of their faith' - sounds pretty knee jerk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. I don't think so
Reading the responses here, it seems that the major complaint is that someone in the government spoke of her faith (to a group who share that faith, nonetheless) and that therefore a horrible breach of the first amendment has occurred and we're all on the way down a short, sharp slope to theocracy.

There is nothing wrong with a public person speaking of their faith. There is, however, everything wrong with someone insisting that everyone else conform to their faith - or, for that matter, their lack of it.

The objection doesn't seem to be with any legislative ideas she puts forward while talking about her faith, but about the mere fact that she mentioned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. IBTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. yuck..just leave your religion out of the political sphere. ro
I do not care what religion you are, just don't spout dogma when discussing policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Maybe she's just referring to The Colbert Report
And that's The Word. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Or since she was at the Paul McCartney show at the WH
The Word by Lennon and McCartney. LOL The Word is love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcboon Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Nothing wrong with it
It was after all the Catholic Community Conference. She was stating an opinion about personal convictions.

When the left starts marginalizing politically liberal Christians it starts forming the circular firing squad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I am a religious liberal. You can't be a liberal if you are religious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Me too. And I think it's a preposterous idea being put forth here nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. I think some here have to realize there are liberals like us.
My church is very progressive, allows women ministers and we are not against gay rights in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Same with mine
Not to mention the very many churches whose focus is on helping those in need. Without proselytizing, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Yes, our church has gone to Haiti in the past (before the earthquake) to help
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 05:40 PM by Jennicut
get clean water fountains in poorer areas. Some churches do very good things. Some are terrible. I hate being thrown in with the terrible ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. It's just easier to lump it all together
and stick it in a box labelled "hate".

That nuance thing - Dubya wasn't the only one who doesn't much like it, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. Mine is close. It's The F Word n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. Damn, I heard the bird is the word,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. No. Grease is the Word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. Holy moly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. The Word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm sorry, but I don't get how otherwise intelligent people really believe this nonsense.
I mean, seriously, Jesus is going to come back? Yeah, aaaaaany day now. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. That's where the "otherwise" comes into play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. It is possible
If Jesus was abducted by Aliens and has been traveling at close to light speed. Thus he has aged almost not at all compared to the planet Earth. So he could theoretically return after aging virtually not at all.

Of course, I do not believe it. But it is more likely than him dying, rising, and living with a grand fatherly overlord figure in the sky.

However, his philosophy is so endearing, I could see why his followers wish to believe he could never die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
61. vomit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
63. Big Whup! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC