Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 08:44 AM
Original message
Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force
Edited on Thu Jun-03-10 08:56 AM by kpete
Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force

By Dana Milbank and Justin Blum
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, November 16, 2005

A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 -- something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.

The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being debated.

In a joint hearing last week of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees, the chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and ConocoPhillips said their firms did not participate in the 2001 task force. The president of Shell Oil said his company did not participate "to my knowledge," and the chief of BP America Inc. said he did not know.

Chevron was not named in the White House document, but the Government Accountability Office has found that Chevron was one of several companies that "gave detailed energy policy recommendations" to the task force. In addition, Cheney had a separate meeting with John Browne, BP's chief executive, according to a person familiar with the task force's work; that meeting is not noted in the document.

more:
never forget:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111501842.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. cheney has been pretty quiet lately
hiding in his bunker on the lowlow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. oh yea, that snake is laying low.
his fingerprints are all over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, will there be perjury charges brought?
Now days all testimony before Congress is sworn, and if 'industry officials testifying before Congress" lied then they should be charged, should they not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes they should
OOOOHHHHHHHH

I forgot, laws only apply to the little person.
The Constitution clearly states that "people with money and power shall have more rights than others
and can only have laws applied to them that they deem fitting".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Would those charges be against the corporations,
or the humans that spoke the words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, Oil Chiefs WERE the Cheney task force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. DIng ding
We have a winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R! Thanks for staying on top of this, kpete!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Sneer." - xVP Dickie 'Five-Military-Deferments' Cheneney (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. It Was Carving Up Turf...
The need to get those minutes are as compelling as ever...I'll bet we can trace back several scandals from what went on behind those closed doors. It wasn't as much about passing legislation as it was getting around existing laws, watering them down and getting "friendly" regulators...letting the oil companies name the people who were supposed to "oversee" them. The fix went in and is still in as the oil companies went full speed ahead in "drill baby drill" with little regard to consequences and they knew they had friends in very high places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. of course they did, and they conspired to fuck over you and me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. ------ ---------------- ----------- -------->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick, and let's not forget when some Taliban leaders were flown to Sugarland in someone's corporate
jet in 1997-98, to discuss that Caspian Sea pipeline...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. bttt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC