Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Claim Access to Spill Site Has Been Limited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 11:49 PM
Original message
Media Claim Access to Spill Site Has Been Limited
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/30/us/AP-US-Gulf-Oil-Spill-Media-Access.html?_r=1

Media organizations say they are being allowed only limited access to areas impacted by the Gulf oil spill through restrictions on plane and boat traffic that are making it difficult to document the worst spill in U.S. history.

In at least two cases, a media organization and a seaplane pilot say BP PLC -- the company responsible for cleaning up the spill -- appeared to have a role in deciding on access.

Other media, including The Associated Press, have reported coverage problems because their access has been restricted, though not all have linked the decision to BP. Government officials say restrictions are needed to protect wildlife and ensure safe air traffic.

Ted Jackson, a photographer for The Times-Picayune newspaper in New Orleans, said Saturday that access to the spill ''is slowly being strangled off.''

A CBS news story said one of its reporting teams was threatened with arrest by the Coast Guard and turned back from an oiled beach at the mouth of the Mississippi River. The story said the reporters were told the denial was under ''BP's rules.''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. and where the fuck is our TRANSPARENT government about this?
oh yeah setting up Staged photo opps!

no "media, journalists, photographers, or SCIENTISTS"

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/28/...


Jean-Michel Cousteau was turned away too. Quote from this article:

Photographers Say BP Restricts Access to Oil Spill - Newsweek

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/26/the-missing-oil-spill-photos.html


BP's Photo Blockade of the Gulf Oil Spill
Photographers say BP and government officials are preventing them from documenting the impact of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.



Jean-Michel Cousteau (center) was turned away from a wildlife sanctuary by the U.S. Coast Guard after they discovered that an AP photographer was on board.

As BP makes its latest attempt to plug its gushing oil well, news photographers are complaining that their efforts to document the slow-motion disaster in the Gulf of Mexico are being thwarted by local and federal officials—working with BP—who are blocking access to the sites where the effects of the spill are most visible. More than a month into the disaster, a host of anecdotal evidence is emerging from reporters, photographers, and TV crews in which BP and Coast Guard officials explicitly target members of the media, restricting and denying them access to oil-covered beaches, staging areas for clean-up efforts, and even flyovers.

Last week, a CBS TV crew was threatened with arrest when attempting to film an oil-covered beach. On Monday, Mother Jones published this firsthand account of one reporter’s repeated attempts to gain access to clean-up operations on oil-soaked beaches, and the telling response of local law enforcement. The latest instance of denied press access comes from Belle Chasse, La.-based Southern Seaplane Inc., which was scheduled to take a New Orleans Times-Picayune photographer for a flyover on Tuesday afternoon, and says it was denied permission once BP officials learned that a member of the press would be on board.

“We are not at liberty to fly media, journalists, photographers, or scientists,” the company said in a letter it sent on Tuesday to Sen. David Vitter (R-La.). “We strongly feel that the reason for this massive is that BP wants to control their exposure to the press.”

The ability to document a disaster, particularly through images, is key to focusing the nation’s attention on it, and the resulting clean-up efforts. Within days of the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, pictures of dead otters, fish, and birds, as well as oil-covered shorelines, ignited nationwide outrage and led to a backlash against Exxon. Consumers returned some 10,000 of Exxon’s 7 million credit cards. Forty days after the spill, protestors organized a national boycott of Exxon. So far, no national boycott of BP is in the works, despite growing frustration over the company’s inability to cap the leaking well. Obviously, pictures are emerging from this spill, but much of the images are coming from BP and government sources.

snip:

A CBS TV crew was threatened with arrest when attempting to film an oil-covered beach last week. On Saturday, reporter Mac McClelland was blocked by police from visiting an island in Louisiana.

On Tuesday, a photographer with the New Orleans Times-Picayune was prevented from flying over the ocean after the plane company was issued with a temporary flight restriction after BP officials learned that a member of the press would be on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. dupe
Edited on Sun May-30-10 08:41 AM by flyarm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Look for a moment at the other side of the coin...
how many 'journalists' are trying to fly over or cruise over to the spill site? There literally may be thousands...only a few of whom need to be there.

If just one reporter gets in, the gate has to open for all of them. Certainly the Times-Picaroon ought to be allowed since this is their territory(they cover the entire gulf coast).

Might have more to do with the air and surface overload with choppers and boats...and/or causing more damage by going into sensitive areas with polluted vehicles of all types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am going to go and get myself arrested
Edited on Sun May-30-10 08:48 AM by Cetacea
Filming the entire time, of course. I'll try to get info on the worst areas that our beautiful minds are not permitted to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. This Is A Crime Scene...
Every drop of oil that laps up on the shore is another piece of evidence in a crime of negligence and corporate coruption. We've seen BP try to downplay this disaster from the outset and appears to want to cover-up as much as they can and deal with the consequences later. This is the first phase of this crisis...as long as the oil gushes, the best is a make-shift attempt at a clean-up since the flow is far greater than the capabilities of BP, the Coast Guard and anyone else to keep up with.

I've seen some very good reporting about this disaster. NatGeo will be airing a special on the cause of the blowout that is very much worth watching and damning of all the parties involved. I've also seen reporters out on boats and in planes...you can't hide a mess this big. No surprise that access is restricted...and in some cases it may be warranted as the entire Gulf region is now turned into a crime scene...the more BP tries to "control" this story the worse it gets for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not officially though. More like a cover-up in progress
The lack of coverage of our most beloved mammals is seriously suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Give It Time...
In the NatGeo special it showed a shark struggling in an oil slick...and unfortunately this mess isn't going away. I would imagine if there's a widespread die off on the beaches, it'd be too big to hide...the visuals too powerful. And, I suspect in time we will see the affects this disaster has on marine life.

Ironically, when I was watching the webcam, I saw what appeared to be an eel swim right through the plume...curious but surely not appearing in any distress. Nature is taking a big hurt with this disaster, but its also very resilliant.

The crime will be to the people who rely on the Gulf for their livlihoods...as well as the families of the 11 killed on the platform...to them each drop of oil is yet another piece of evidence in a crime...and it appears the DOJ is looking at it in a similar vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Good points. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. This question was NOT asked on Meet The Press
Ironic, no? You would think this is one question "The Press" would ask of Carol Browner when she was on this morning..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Don't worry, Obama's in charge now.
That's all you need to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. I love these stories the media makes up about themselves
They're complaining that they cannot report on the obvious: there are shitloads of oil spilling into the ocean that isn't being cleaned up or stopped. I do hope something can be set up to rotate some of these idiots in so they can feel they have access to something they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. So I guess U.S .Fish and Wildlife is doing the same eh?
Just making up stories about limited access? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't think they're fabricating the stories about being blocked access
I do believe they're reporting on themselves because they have no other story to talk about. I also believe the people dealing with the response have better things to be doing other than baby sitting these people so media can feel like they've got access to something that's going on a mile under the ocean. It seems we already know what is going on (lots of oil is flowing into the gulf, the response is incompetent, and the environment is in danger) so I don't know what the media thinks they can add to the story beyond this at this point.

As for US Fish and Wildlife, I didn't know they were a media organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. My point is that USFW is not media but is complaining
Edited on Sun May-30-10 09:30 AM by Cetacea
about the same thing. I agree with you about "gotcha" type Fox "journalists" but outside people should be able to report on damage. Do you feel the same way about covering wars? People are getting killed, nothing more to report?

edit: And you know what you can do with your snark, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. What about closing off the air space so that the scope of the problem is unknown?
Why is that a valid action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The scope of the problem is known by satelite imagery
And they can fly at 3,000 ft, so that can easily get the big picture of the problem as well. I assume the lower airspace is limited because of recovery efforts (i.e. planes releasing the toxic dispersant and helicopters involved in the response). Put a fast 300mm lens on your camera and the 3000ft limitation becomes moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC