Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

on KO: Lawrence O'Donnell now calling it a homicide.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:10 PM
Original message
on KO: Lawrence O'Donnell now calling it a homicide.
Edited on Tue May-25-10 07:14 PM by GreatCaesarsGhost
the oil rig explosion.

edit spelling. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. 11 counts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would be "homicide"
Edited on Tue May-25-10 07:12 PM by WeDidIt
The term, "homocide" is a derogatory term.

Your thread will be locked if you do not change the spelling ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I noticed that too.
Oh dear. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. done. no offense intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. how tightly wound are you?
geez its a typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Oddly enough though, the way O'Donnell was pronouncing the word
really DID sound like he was saying "homocide".

Not that he was implying the 11 dead oil workers were gay, nor would it have made a difference if they were. It's just how he said it.

But then homo (as in sapiens) doesn't always refer to sexual orientation anyway. So I'm not sure why you had to go there. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. That's sad.
It's worse than derogatory, IMO, because the primary use of the term for decades was within law enforcement circles, which makes the term that much worse.

Sad.

Just sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Hardly.
Chillax, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't suppose he mentioned
how intent would be proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. such a thing as negligent homicide
Edited on Tue May-25-10 07:17 PM by Lerkfish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. aka
manslaughter - in the UK anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. ...and the punchline is

Every state defines and classifies homicides in its own way.

So, once we identify the state in question...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Oh dear
We obviously don't have such issues in the UK other than the fact that England uses common law and Scotland uses Roman law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. If you know a safety device or measure is needed to keep people alive...
And you make a conscious decision NOT to employ the safety element, you have made a decision... you are saying that you knowingly put lives at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Then how come
there was, and remains, no requirement for the device to be fitted in the USA whereas there is in Europe. I'm assuming we're talking about the same device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Ask Bush...
This well was his baby... there were allegedly 6 or seven "fixes" that should have been there... clearly some regulatory agency was asleep at the switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. As far as I'm aware
none of the wells in the Gulf are fitted with those : not just this one. Like I said there simply was no requirement. Blaming Bush after a year and half may not be quite such a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. The other damning info is from Schlumberger testimony:
BP contracted Schlumberger (SLB) to run the Cement Bond Log (CBL) test that was the final test on the plug that was skipped. The people testifying have been very coy about mentioning this, and you’ll see why.
SLB is an extremely highly regarded (and incredibly expensive) service company. They place a high standard on safety and train their workers to shut down unsafe operations.
SLB gets out to the Deepwater Horizon to run the CBL, and they find the well still kicking heavily, which it should not be that late in the operation. SLB orders the “company man” (BP’s man on the scene that runs the operation) to dump kill fluid down the well and shut-in the well. The company man refuses. SLB in the very next sentence asks for a helo to take all SLB personel back to shore. The company man says there are no more helo’s scheduled for the rest of the week (translation: you’re here to do a job, now do it). SLB gets on the horn to shore, calls SLB’s corporate HQ, and gets a helo flown out there at SLB’s expense and takes all SLB personnel to shore.
6 hours later, the platform explodes.

http://www.healingphilosophy.com/2010/05/bp-deepwater-horizon-disaster-what.html

To me, that info damns BP for INTENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. I heard about this on the radio this morning!
They absolutely had intent to put the workers and the gulf in deadly danger!

BP needs their assets frozen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I've seen that story about SLB reported & am shocked it's not gotten more attention. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. IIUC, it's not about the precautionary measure. It's about BP Executives ordering work to continue
AFTER things were found to not be going properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Well, there is the matter of BP execs being on the rig just before the explosion.
And if they fled the premises, knowing that the lives of the workers were in jeopardy with no attempt to evacuate them, that certainly would not look good.

Not to mention the whole question of all the "cost cutting" measures.... the switch they refused to install, the bad cement job, etc, etc.

Clearly there should be an investigation here. And I'm not talking about a "bipartisan commission" whitewash, but something involving some actual law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well that is pretty much devoid of meaning

"Homicide" is the killin of a person.

It can be accidental, negligent, reckcless, or any of the various intentional sorts of homicide usually termed "murder" in one of several degrees. States define them and name them differently.

Did Mr. Odonnel perhaps refer to any particular sort of homicide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. There were 11 people killed, seems like negligent homicide to me.
Especially if it's true that the Schlumberger people evacuated in a hurry over safety concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Then the interesting question is

In which state did this happen?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The rig was registered as a Marshall Islands rig
so there is one jurisdiction. There could be others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10.  Sounds far left.
And we dont take to kindly to no far lefts in these here parts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. Have to agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC