Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wouldn't send my son to die in Korea to keep their multinational corporations safe. Would you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:41 AM
Original message
I wouldn't send my son to die in Korea to keep their multinational corporations safe. Would you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaebol

Chaebol (alternatively Jaebol, Jaebeol; Korean pronunciation: ) refers to a South Korean form of business conglomerate. They are powerful global multinationals owning numerous international enterprises. The Korean word means "business family" or "monopoly" and is often used the way "conglomerate" is used in English.

There are several dozen large Korean family-controlled corporate groups which fall under this definition. Through aggressive governmental support and finance, some have become well-known international brand names, such as Samsung, Hyundai and LG.

The chaebol has also played a some significant role in South Korean politics. In 1988 a member of a chaebol family, Chong Mong-jun, president of Hyundai Heavy Industries, successfully ran for the National Assembly. Other business leaders also were chosen to be members of the National Assembly through proportional representation. Since 2000, Hyundai has played a role in the thawing of North Korean and South Korean relations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. And the invading North Koreans would only hurt corporations not people? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No
Most definitely the North Koreans would hurt people, thousands upon thousands of people. That wasn't the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. So how is teh question relevant?
What military threat to corporations specifically rather than people would we be required to die for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. our sons/daughters are dying in afghan/pak/iraq to keep multinational corps safe right now nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wouldn't send my son there either for the record
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:20 AM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. i am not going ot send my son to die,..... period. anywhere. we really are going to have to
find different ways to deal with these issues than allowing sons to die. cause that is simply too far beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hell no. Too many sons and daughters are
already dying in too many of our wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Don't start wars and don't reward others that do.
Over the decades we could have insisted that South Korea militarize its own society to keep the North at bay on their own, so that we could withdraw. That hasn't happened.

They are a prosperous society now and should be able to build their own military to the point it can resist a Stalinist, militarily strong, economically weak repressive adversary without That would take years, though. I don't think it is right to pretend to be there as a protector for decades but then leave as soon as any real fighting were to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC