Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept. consents to immunity for Goodling's testimony before Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 04:53 PM
Original message
Justice Dept. consents to immunity for Goodling's testimony before Congress
The Department of Justice on Monday consented to the House Judiciary Committee's plan to grant immunity to former White House Liaison Monica Goodling. The move clears the major hurdle to Goodling's testimony before the committee on her role in the firing of 8 US Attorneys.

"Today the Department of Justice gave notice that it would not object to the House Judiciary Committee's grant of use immunity for Monica Goodling. I believe obtaining her testimony will be a critical step in our efforts to get to the truth about the circumstances surrounding the US Attorney firings and possible politicization in the Department's prosecutorial function," Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said in a statement e-mailed to RAW STORY.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Justice_Dept._consents_to_immunity_for_0507.html

do we need extreme renditioning here; a little water boarding may be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds Like It's Already Been Done, on the Just-Us Department!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't realize Congress needed Justice permission to grant immunity..
Seems strange to me but I am no lawyer.....I guess since it ultimately is Justice that would prosecute I guess it does make sense they would have to sign off on it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. So now, if she refuses to testify, it's a crime
Obstruction of justice, perjury, etc. Unless I'm mistaken, she can't NOT answer now without serious reprcussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC