Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin claims Rachel Maddow was "prejudiced" in her Paul interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:47 AM
Original message
Palin claims Rachel Maddow was "prejudiced" in her Paul interview
So, let me lay this all out and think it through for a second...

- Paul says that PRIVATE BUSINESSES should retain the right to discriminate against certain people or groups of people.

- That means (logically) that the employees of said private business also hold that right.

- Discrimination is almost always (but not solely) the result of Prejudgment or Prejudice.

- Rachel Maddow is the employee of a private business and acting on behalf of that private business in her interview with Paul.

Conclusion: Rachel Maddow is well within her rights to prejudge Rand Paul and his views and act in a discriminatory manner toward him.


Yeah, that knife cuts both ways you ignorant, clueless, dumbasses.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. You didn't post that Palin said
that what Paul really said was he disagreed with a portion of the bill but agreed with the whole bill. Another chance to tell a lie, Palin doesn't miss one does she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who really cares what the DimWit from Wasilla thinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I just find it ironic (and unsurprising)
that the "philosophical" position is that discrimination is okay, but when it comes down to cases they have a problem with someone "discriminating" against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Palin would not understand what you just wrote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. This Lady Is An Idiot...
That is all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. The usual response to sister Sarah
should be zzzzzzz. She is snore inducing and should be ignored, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. although i can not stand to hear sarah`s voice...
i`d pay a dollar to see rachell shred her to tiny little pieces.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm sure you meant that figuratively but I have this image in my mind...
:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

I'd pay a lot of dollars to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Doncha know it violates his freedom of the press
For RM to make it tough for him?

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lady Blah Blah strikes again! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Excellent tag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. ow we have one doofus defending another doofus against the lamestream media..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC