Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dispersant is just a liability ploy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:42 PM
Original message
Dispersant is just a liability ploy
Eventually it is the oil that we leave in the habitat that will peculate up the food chain and into us. BP won't be liable for the oil that has gone missing into the environment! And they have been selling to us that dispersing into the environment is a good thing; ehem, for them.

It is really NOT in interest of BP to accurately asses the damage, or the quantity of oil in the water. Period, they are a blood sucking corporation who preys upon our better nature. Don't think they care about anything but profit, and liability.

Point two... Why does it seem like BP doesn't want to stop their leak? All I hear is capture, capture, capture the oil. Any attempt to stop the leak out right is not in the best interest of BP. Fear the catastrophe if you try and do it any other way but the BP way. Me thinks this is about trying not to abandon their investment.

They have been positioning their company to decrease liability and best profit off their investments. Even their failures need a bright side, you know like a little profit.

But please sign here Mr. Citizen BP, your friend who is going to pay you a couple of quick bucks, needs you first to waive their liability in this matter.


Someone arrest these oily executives their response is based on how much it is going to cost them, not cost us in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well they are using dispersants produced by a corporation they have a vested interest in
How can they lose? So yeah, why would they want to stop it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They prioritize based on how profitable it is to their interests
Corporation is just another word for king in 2010.

They are a cancer at the heart of "We the people", without liability corporations kill PEOPLE for profit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC