Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WEBCAM UPDATE:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:20 PM
Original message
WEBCAM UPDATE:
Edited on Fri May-14-10 03:21 PM by PCIntern
I am not going to post any opinion...just the link and the article.


http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20100514_Lower_Merion_permanently_banned_from_webcam_monitoring.html

Lower Merion permanently banned from webcam monitoring
By John P. Martin

INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

A federal judge Friday permanently barred the Lower Merion School District from using webcams or other intrusive technology to secretly monitor students through their school-issued laptops.

The five-page injunction signed by U.S. District Judge Jan E. DuBois also requires the suburban district to adopt transparent and expansive policies by September to govern its student laptop program.

It says Lower Merion can implement an alternative to webcam tracking to find missing or stolen computers, but only if the technology is "conspicuously disclosed" in a document signed by students and their parents. And it says the district needs to make accommodations for students who don't want to participate.



The order was not unexpected. It followed weeks of negotiations by lawyers for the district and students' families, and it did not stray too far from the spirit of the temporary restraints the judge imposed in February. It also mirrored many of the practices Lower Merion officials had already pledged to institute.

+++++++++++

More at the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. A victory for civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Could go for seeing some punishment against the district over it, though. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Perhaps. What would be the goal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. To serve notice to school district personnel nationwide
That they need to start re-thinking their behavior toward students. End zero tolerance. An excellent quote from a comment made on one of the numerous stories nationwide reflects my exact beliefs:

This all boils down to the unethical assumption that schools are instruments of social control and that school administrators have some sort of say so on students' lives outside of school. It all started with the VP questioning what the kid was doing at home. It was like she was giving him a chance to turn himself in... We are here to educate, not to be officers of societal ethics enforcement. This whole idea that kids can be punished at school for what they do outside of school is SCARY... it is Fascist, Manipulative, and encroaches on our Constitutional Rights. Administrators now try to act like the secret social police... trying to pick up on signs of non-conformity. FIRE THE PIGS! Send the technocratic control freaks to the unemployment line and see how they feel when they have to justify what they do when they're not at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. lol @ the unreccer: I cancelled you out
Edited on Fri May-14-10 03:29 PM by eShirl
nyah-nyah!


k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And I unrecced upon seeing your post
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:29 PM by ashling
:) and lol to you , too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. and others are now reccing upon seeing yours
nyah-nyah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. As they have the right to do
the difference between our reactions to this is that you find this action somehow relevant. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. How nice to know that the district was THAT desparate to stay out of court
But shouldn't someone at the district lose their job over this?

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why no opinion?
just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you for this update.
I really hope they nail some asses to the wall over this in the long run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds to me like this judge is convinced the administration did something wrong
There will be civil liability.

Count on it.

I would also not be surprised if there were some criminal indictments down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I hope so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. If that's the only outcome they got off lucky
Thank you for keeping us informed of this ongoing story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good progress, but some people at LMSD need to be fired
Over this, as an example to other school district's personnel who might think of misusing their authority. And I personally believe the students' civil rights were violated. Hopefully the court will agree with this, and this will help set precedents, in order to start reigning in overzealous school districts with their zero tolerance crap.

Also, the Robbins family is dropping the monetary damages portion of their class action suit. This short circuits the hue and cry of LMSD parents who claim "it was all about the money."

Spy-cam family drops plan for class-action damages

In a new filing, the attorney for Robbins and his parents said they would drop plans to seek monetary damages for all Lower Merion students, acknowledging that his case, the one that lit the firestorm over the district's laptop tracking, was unique.

The move could pave the way for a quicker settlement between the district and the Robbinses and minimize the costs of the webcam furor. But it also opens the door to more individual lawsuits over the now-disabled tracking program.

The Robbinses' attorney, Mark Haltzman, said they weren't backing away from their claim that the district violated high school students' civil rights by secretly snapping photos and capturing screen shots from school-issued laptops over the last two school years.

And the investigation that is part of the civil suit has not halted. Wednesday, the district's former top technology administrator, Virginia DiMedio, answered lawyers' questions under oath about the laptop security program.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. I said from the beginning that there were other ways
Edited on Sun May-16-10 08:06 AM by hobbit709
to track a laptop without using the webcam. A webcam picture does not reveal location unless it happens to fe focused on a street sign or similar address location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC