Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUCHANAN: Jews Are 2% Of Pop., If Kagan Is Confirmed, THEY Will Have 33% Of The Supreme Court Seats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:17 PM
Original message
BUCHANAN: Jews Are 2% Of Pop., If Kagan Is Confirmed, THEY Will Have 33% Of The Supreme Court Seats
My question is why does MSNBC continue to use Pat BUKKKANAN for commentary? :puke:



" From Pat Buchanan's May 14 syndicated column (emphasis added):



Indeed, of the last seven justices nominated by Democrats JFK, LBJ, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, one was black, Marshall; one was Puerto Rican, Sonia Sotomayor. The other five were Jews: Arthur Goldberg, Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.


If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats.


Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity?



But while leaders in the black community may be upset, the folks who look more like the real targets of liberal bias are white Protestants and Catholics, who still constitute well over half of the U.S. population.


Not in living memory has a Democratic president nominated an Irish, Italian or Polish Catholic, though these ethnic communities once gave the party its greatest victories in the cities and states of the North.


What happened to the party of the Daleys, Rizzos and Rostenkowskis?


And not in nearly half a century has a Democratic president nominated a white Protestant or white Catholic man or woman.


<...>


If Kagan is confirmed, the Court will consist of three Jews and six Catholics (who represent not quite a fourth of the country), but not a single Protestant, though Protestants remain half the nation and our founding faith.



<http://mediamatters.org/blog/201005140037>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Once an anti-Semite
...always an anti-Semite.

Can't change the stripes on a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about all those Catholics?
I thought the Supreme Court was all Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. What about 60% of the court is made up of republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. That, too.
There is NOTHING representative about the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. Yeah, funny he doesn't object to that.
Hmmm, I wonder why ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet old Paddy has no problem with the overwhelming Papist representation?
Of course he doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Or the overwhelming male representation nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. I was concerned about that, so I looked up the gender breakdown of people who have law degrees.
About 1/3 of US lawyers are female. Since you would assume a law degree would be necessary for a SCOTUS justice, the Court's future female representation seems about right to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. I don't think that's the argument Buchanan is making, however
His concern is how the Supreme Court reflects the makeup of the population, not the legal profession. That, and his concern about the 'founding faith', whatever that's supposed to mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. Yes, you are obviously right.
And another thing obvious to me is, the framers of the Constitution had a deliberate intention that there would be no such thing as a founding faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Damned Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Yeah, actually, he does
"...but not a single Protestant, though Protestants remain half the nation and our founding faith."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...and Catholics will have the other 67% of the "representation".
I do know that the US is not 67% Catholic.

Bottom line: What the hell are you talking about, Pat?

1) The Supreme Court is not a representative body, and 2) you're a fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sue and take it to the Supreme Court, Pat . . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. So who on msnbc is going to call out this racist on his comments?
Any thoughts?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Damned Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Joe Scarborough, of course!
We've all seen what a hard time he gives Buchanan every time they're on together! I swear to God that Joe once told Pat--eye to eye--that his tie clashed with his suit!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Scarborough is my bulimia trigger
I can't watch him, because my gorge goes on automatic.

How about Rachel? She's laid into him on at least one other occasion (it was within the last year, but my brain fart just kicked in, so I can't tell you exactly when or why).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. For a minute, I almost forgot she was Jewish.
Right, Tweety?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Until now, I didn't even know she was
Kind of a yawner for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Seriously

People are really obsessing over things that fall into the "don't know, don't care, don't care to know" category relative to the Kagan nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. Um, pretty sure Bluebear was taking a shot at Tweety, and his
ridiculous & pathetic comment several weeks back or so about Obama : "I almost forgot he was black!" :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. That was the one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why am I not surprised
that Buchanan has a problem with the three Jews, but NOT the six Catholics?

As I've said previously, both groups are over represented here, and I don't think there's anything wrong in saying so in and of itself. There should be a Protestant. And a Muslim. And a Native American. And an Atheist. And a Wiccan. I'm sure I'm leaving some folks out there, but I counted up to 5. Which is coincidentally the number of "justices" who really need to be replaced. (and Stevens ain't one of those 5)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. yeah if we could just find a Muslim Wiccan Jew......
:sarcasm:


(sorry, just couldn't resist the joke!) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Hey why the Hell not?
I'd rather have a judge on the court that was confused about his or her spirituality, than another "Democrat" enacting a bunch of right wing corporatist horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Always nice to see why the "broken clock" is broken.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:52 PM by Behind the Aegis
His comments are not unexpected and are more common than one might think. I have even heard that argument here in regards to Jews in the Congress. There are lots of people who take his stance...one Jew too many.

Edit to add his "opinion" summed up in a single picture:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our founding faith? I must have missed that part of the Constitution, Pat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Buchanan's such a charming little leprechaun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's already known that he's antisemitic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Maybe someone should inform MSNBC of that little nugget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh no!! Jooooooos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Overrepresented in so many fields...Their commitment to civilization and wisdom is indeed disturbing
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Give Pat a break. He lost an uncle in Auschwitz.
The uncle fell out of a guard tower and died instantly on impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL
<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Tragic

Too bad it wasn't his father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. LMAO!
I guarantee you that I WILL be stealing that one. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
58. !!!
Nice! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. Buchanan is a Nazi. There's nothing new about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Damned Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Destructive language
Buchanan is a boob! Let's keep our eyes open for genuine Nazis. They're here: You can see 'em marching every day on Fox!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
65. if Pat had lived in 1940s Germany, he would've be shining his boots and straightening his medals
and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
56. there you go giving Nazis a bad name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Cherish your inner-nazi Pat, it is always a pleasure to see it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pat Buchanan is the guru for
the Nixon and post-Nixon ReTHUG philosophical and ideological approach to power and governance. He is a nasty racist piece of scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. same rationale folks here used to recommend kagan: "she's a woman, it's about time the old boys
club was broken up"

identity politics = dead end & double-edged sword
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. +1
The only identity politics that works is class identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
76. +2 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. Actually, racists and sexists dominate the court
So he got that one wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. So what?
Edited on Fri May-14-10 01:56 PM by jberryhill
Why anyone hands a microphone to that awful man is a mystery.

But another veil drops....

These people are always fond of calling our heritage "Judeo-Christian" when they don't want to reveal themselves as anti-semites.

But it is refreshing, at least, to see Buchanan drop the pretense and say that they don't really mean to include Jews, or even Catholics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Pat Buchanan wants to talk to us about diversity?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. So, is Obama a Nazi
or not? I'm so confused! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
39. lol, there goes crazy uncle pat again, goin on about his "joos"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. Pat Buchanan is only one in
over 300 million. No one would miss him if he went away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. Buchanan is a twit.....
hell, look at how many Catholics and those weird Opus Dei jerks are on the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. 44% Will Hail From NY
22% From New Jersey

22% From Ca.

11% From Ga.

Numbers...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. Hiring based on religion and race?
Yikes, I smell law suit that goes all the way to the Supreme Court. Wait, how that does that work when Kagan will be a Supreme Court Judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Italian Americans are 6% of the population - USSC is 22% Italian-American......
Edited on Fri May-14-10 02:31 PM by suston96
dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
46. Italian Americans are 6% of the population - USSC is 22% Italian-American......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
47. So? What's wrong with Jews?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
48. Sez the Hitler apologist
What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. Did the man ignore the fact that seven whites sit on the SCOTUS?
And if you count Benedict Thomas, that makes "eight".

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. The race makeup of the court isn't that far off from the general population
White:
US, 75%
SCOTUS, 75%

Black:
US, 12.4%
SCOTUS, 12.5%

Hispanic:
US, 15.4%
SCOTUS, 12.5%

Now gender representation is another story, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unabelladonna Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
53. interesting concept...
but at this point in time mr buchanan doesn't even try to disguise his anti-semitism. at one point, he wrapped it in anti-israel rants (but almost all anti-israelis(zionists) are not anti-semitic). he doesn't hide it anymore. there's beginning to be an undercurrent in these terrible economic times to scapegoat...and we all know where that leads (although i don't believe it will be embraced by america at large). i'm as anti-banker as anyone (and i'm jewish).

but, who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
54. Pat's crying about the lack of Nazi war criminal representation on the Court!!
Here's a phone, Pat - call someone who cares!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
55. Delete - duplicate.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 02:45 PM by bullwinkle428
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
60. I thought the SCOTUS represented the US as a whole.
Not certain ethnic groups, races or religions.
Thanks, Pat! I have seen the light!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Well by his, er, "reasoning"...
...you cannot have even one Jewish person on the Supreme Court since that would be 11% of the court rather than the required 2%.

Hmmm, wasn't Buchanan against quotas? Why yes, indeed, he was.

What an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
63. How much of the country is old, fat, white men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
64. Also there are no gay bald women Protestant or Catholic, no one in a wheelchair
No Rastafarians, no Muslims, no Wiccans, only 1 fat-ass...how many vegetarians?

Since the GOP nominated and passed an Italian like Scalia I don't blame the Dems for avoiding THAT. But what's their excuse for ignoring Black Polish American atheists???? Good griefy Jeebers.

A mummified Irish-American (Catholic?) like Buchanan is offended because the white, male "founding faith" W.A.S.P.S. aren't holding the majority on the Supreme Court AND haven't been nominated by the Dems.

This is why Americans can't express outrage anymore - our brain cells are paralyzed with this stupid shit. Up his medication.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I concur but the sad reality is that we have allowed ourselves to be duped by such
hate discourse. By watching MSNBC programming such as ' Morning Joe & Hardball ' ( who continue to host rodents like Buchanan, providing him a REGULAR soap box to spew his ignorant hate rants against groups ) we directly partake in that program's marketshare success without outrage or protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
67. What a D-bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
69. Surprised he had time to write this column.
I heard that he's been out, double dating every night with Jesse James.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightHawk63 Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
70. Suck it up Buchanan!
I'm Black and I have NO representation on the High Court. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
71. POS Buchanan, why does anyone employ this asshole? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. LOLOL. Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
73. Herr Buchanan doesn't try to hide his White Christian Hetero Supremacism


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
74. I'll settle for 9 athiests... for impartiality's sake.
Or Pastafarians. How about a few years off from the talking-snake crowd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
77. I was unaware we had a founding faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. I have a founding faith: I believe
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:38 PM by nichomachus
I'll have another beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Have one on me.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
78. Headline: Pat Buchanan comes out in favor of quotas
The Buchanan family is about as sane as the Fred Phelps family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
81. When the hell is MSNBC going to fire this bigot?
Edited on Fri May-14-10 06:54 PM by RamboLiberal
KO must seethe inside he can't make Pat the worst person in the world. KO, Rachel, Ed and even Tweety would be ripping Pat a new one if he worked for Faux.

I got so sick of Pat's whites won't vote for Obama crap in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
82. Does Rachel still have him on her show sometimes? She has some Jewish ancestry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC